Last visit was: 15 May 2026, 21:11 It is currently 15 May 2026, 21:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mrmikec
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Last visit: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dkverma
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Last visit: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 98
Kudos: 719
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
buzzgaurav
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Last visit: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Posts: 354
Kudos: 96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 893
Own Kudos:
Posts: 893
Kudos: 648
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will go with C.
The author talks about this years decline and make a assertion that it will increase the prices in the coming two years.
But if the drought conditions are reversed next year then the trend (increase in prices) doesnot hold true.
B also sounds good........

OA please
User avatar
Beyond700
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Last visit: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
Posts: 206
Kudos: 110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow this is too good :P

Lets break down the argument

Drought is there and is affecting the corns harvest by more than 1/3rds its usual...
This directly shoots up the inflation .and affects in the coming years as well..

Author's conclusion - spend a small amount to irrigate the the
larget affected corn fields which will eventually avert the inflation.. or insure inflation for sure...

Straight 'B'

'A' - other areas should produce more than their usual to compensate the central territory.

'C' - so what..what is it got to do with the author's conclusion...

We are trying to validate author's conclusion here..

'D' - strengthens, but it is redundant to the conclusion

'E' - we don't know if not the government than the public can also take the responsibility here...
User avatar
GMATPsycho
Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Last visit: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Posts: 16
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pls note the question first: "This argument is valid only if....."

This means, the above argument is valid only if the assumption is true.
And the funda here is 'Can we irrigate the corn fields now, to avert inflation in the future?'

Now lets tackle the options,
(A) Firstly there is drought and because of that there is a 33% decrease in the year's corn yield. This option leads to further decrease in the corn yield saying the other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields. Thus, cannot be the answer.
(B) This option sounds right the fiirst time but is not fully true. The word 'only' infact tends to lead this answer being incorrect.
(C) PR style: This would have been the Joe Bloggs answer. The heat wave doesnt have to persist for two years. The inflation of 17% happens in the first year itself.
(D) This option is very similar to Option (B) but without the word 'only'. This option is true, but I would rate it the second best option in the list.
(E) The only option left out. Now, try looking at the argument from the author's point of view - the reason for him to write this passage.
This option supports the conclusion, and only if this is true, can the rest of the story progress.
User avatar
amansingla4
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Last visit: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Posts: 69
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it should be A...
OA please?
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 218
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B is my answer.
D is close but "insure" in the sentence boots it ... it should be "ensure"; insure means something else.
User avatar
gmatmba
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 515
Own Kudos:
Location: France
Posts: 515
Kudos: 115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
a) other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields this year. Maybe, but I thought we are talking about Australia?!?

b) irrigation is the only way that the national corn harvest can be significantly increased. YES argument is only valid if irrigation is the only option

c) the hear wave and drought will persist through the next two years. so what ? import corn, dammit

d) irrigation will insure that corn harvests reach normal levels. yeah but so can only things like corn imports

e) it is politically feasible for government authorities to spend money irrigating fields at the present time. out of scope
User avatar
paddyboy
Joined: 06 May 2006
Last visit: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 387
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatmba
a) other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields this year. Maybe, but I thought we are talking about Australia?!?

b) irrigation is the only way that the national corn harvest can be significantly increased. YES argument is only valid if irrigation is the only option

c) the hear wave and drought will persist through the next two years. so what ? import corn, dammit

d) irrigation will insure that corn harvests reach normal levels. yeah but so can only things like corn imports

e) it is politically feasible for government authorities to spend money irrigating fields at the present time. out of scope


:lol: Good point about A.

Agree with B. The only problem with D seems to be that it does not state that irrigation is the only solution, while the argument definitely suggests that it is.

However, importing corn does not increase harvests, though it may increase the amount of corn in the country. You probably still have higher inflation due to higher rates of imported corn :idea: But thats a topic for another forum and another discussion :wink:
User avatar
mrmikec
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Last visit: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Posts: 91
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paddyboy
gmatmba
a) other American agricultural areas are also not expected to meet their anticipated corn yields this year. Maybe, but I thought we are talking about Australia?!?

b) irrigation is the only way that the national corn harvest can be significantly increased. YES argument is only valid if irrigation is the only option

c) the hear wave and drought will persist through the next two years. so what ? import corn, dammit

d) irrigation will insure that corn harvests reach normal levels. yeah but so can only things like corn imports

e) it is politically feasible for government authorities to spend money irrigating fields at the present time. out of scope

:lol: Good point about A.

Agree with B. The only problem with D seems to be that it does not state that irrigation is the only solution, while the argument definitely suggests that it is.

However, importing corn does not increase harvests, though it may increase the amount of corn in the country. You probably still have higher inflation due to higher rates of imported corn :idea: But thats a topic for another forum and another discussion :wink:


The OA is B

Basically, this boils down to logic

The argument is constructed as such: If B -> must be A. Or "to prevent drought" - > "must irrigate." Thus B strengthens this but saying it is the only way to prevent drought/inflation. I orginally chose D. But D is "less correct" than B because, as gmatmba stated, it only says that irrigation will work. There are other ways to prevent drought, i.e. imports, time machine, etc.

Thus D says If B -> then A is sufficient
but C says If B -> must be A. A is both necessary and sufficient. (the better option)

I want to thank HongHu for the logic post. If you are having trouble with CR, I would suggest to really go over it and learn it. I spent two lunch hours debating with my co-workers about his posts. (One was a philosphy major) It really helped clear CRs up for me.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
570 posts
368 posts