Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50%
(01:26)
correct 50%
(01:17)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
One year ago, a local government initiated an antismoking advertising campaign in local newspapers, which it financed by imposing a tax on cigarettes of 20 cents per pack. One year later, the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes had declined by 3 percent. Clearly, what was said in the advertisements had an effect, although a small one, on the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen the argument?
A) Residents of the locality have not increased their use of other tobacco products such as snuff and chewing tobacco since the campaign went into effect. B) A substantial number of cigarette smokers in the locality who did not quit smoking during the campaign now smoke less than they did before it began. C) Admissions to the local hospital for chronic respiratory ailments were down by 15 percent one year after the campaign began. D) Merchants in the locality responded to the local tax by reducing the price at which they sold cigarettes by 20 cents per pack. E) Smokers in the locality had incomes that on average were 25 percent lower than those of nonsmokers
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
One year ago, a local government initiated an antismoking advertising campaign in local newspapers, which it financed by imposing a tax on cigarettes of 20 cents per pack. One year later, the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes had declined by 3 percent. Clearly, what was said in the advertisements had an effect, although a small one, on the number of people in the locality who smoke cigarettes.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to strengthen the argument?
A) Residents of the locality have not increased their use of other tobacco products such as snuff and chewing tobacco since the campaign went into effect. B) A substantial number of cigarette smokers in the locality who did not quit smoking during the campaign now smoke less than they did before it began. C) Admissions to the local hospital for chronic respiratory ailments were down by 15 percent one year after the campaign began. D) Merchants in the locality responded to the local tax by reducing the price at which they sold cigarettes by 20 cents per pack. E) Smokers in the locality had incomes that on average were 25 percent lower than those of nonsmokers
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.