Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Stuck at the same GMAT score? Plateaus aren’t about effort—they’re about approach. Watch Srikar’s journey to uncover what truly drives score improvement—and how you can apply it to break your plateau.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hello everone, Hope you all are well.
I understood why director's evidence is flawed and what the first part of the correct answer choice is, but I didn't quite understand the placement of the underlined part in the correct answer choice and it seems as if it is a restrictive modifier that is modifying the word "assertion" but the assertion, which is what proffesor claimed, was not that the responce, what the director said to refute the proffesor's claim, is meant to refute. Could anyone please help in understanding the placement of this ?Professor: Over the past few years, I have noticed that the students coming to our school are less motivated than students here were in previous years. It seems that the school has become more focused on admitting students who can pay full tuition than it is on attracting students who actually want to learn.
Admissions Director: Your assessment is incorrect. Over the past few years we have been using the same application that we have always used, have received approximately the same number of applications that we have received in the past, and have continued to interview applicants as we always have.
The admissions director's response is flawed in that
(Correct Answer) the evidence provided does not conflict with the assertion that the response is meant to refute.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I understood why director's evidence is flawed and what the first part of the correct answer choice is, but I didn't quite understand the placement of the underlined part in the correct answer choice and it seems as if it is a restrictive modifier that is modifying the word "assertion" but the assertion, which is what proffesor claimed, was not that the responce, what the director said to refute the proffesor's claim, is meant to refute. Could anyone please help in understanding the placement of this ?Professor: Over the past few years, I have noticed that the students coming to our school are less motivated than students here were in previous years. It seems that the school has become more focused on admitting students who can pay full tuition than it is on attracting students who actually want to learn.
Admissions Director: Your assessment is incorrect. Over the past few years we have been using the same application that we have always used, have received approximately the same number of applications that we have received in the past, and have continued to interview applicants as we always have.
The admissions director's response is flawed in that
(Correct Answer) the evidence provided does not conflict with the assertion that the response is meant to refute.
Show more
Hi,
Please re-post the whole question according to our rules:
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.