Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and.....
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
44%
(01:28)
correct 56%
(02:24)
wrong
based on 9
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Under laboratory conditions, fruit flies can learn to respond to odors that elicit no response from them in nature. Mutant fruit flies that cannot produce a certain enzyme are, however, incapable of such learning. These mutant flies respond to other odors just as ordinary fruit flies do. Thus it is unlikely that the enzyme's absence impairs the fruit flies' perception of odors, since presumably, fruit flies would not have an enzyme that was needed only for the perception of odors that fruit flies do not respond to in nature. Instead, what the enzyme's absence probably impairs is the fruit flies' ability to learn, since many researchers believe that this enzyme is somehow involved in the process of forming memories.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is evidence that has been used to corroborate a judgment that the argument contends is false; the second is that judgment.
B. The first is a hypothesis that the argument opposes; the second is a judgment that has been advanced in support of that hypothesis.
C. The first is the hypothesis that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second provides support for that hypothesis.
D. The first presents an explicit assumption that is introduced in arguing for the position that the argument adopts; the second provides evidence to support that position.
E. The first offers justification for an assumption that is explicitly made in the argument; the second states that assumption.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Under laboratory conditions, fruit flies can learn to respond to odors that elicit no response from them in nature. Mutant fruit flies that cannot produce a certain enzyme are, however, incapable of such learning. These mutant flies respond to other odors just as ordinary fruit flies do. Thus it is unlikely that the enzyme's absence impairs the fruit flies' perception of odors, since presumably, fruit flies would not have an enzyme that was needed only for the perception of odors that fruit flies do not respond to in nature. Instead, what the enzyme's absence probably impairs is the fruit flies' ability to learn, since many researchers believe that this enzyme is somehow involved in the process of forming memories.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is evidence that has been used to corroborate a judgment that the argument contends is false; the second is that judgment.
B. The first is a hypothesis that the argument opposes; the second is a judgment that has been advanced in support of that hypothesis.
C. The first is the hypothesis that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second provides support for that hypothesis.
D. The first presents an explicit assumption that is introduced in arguing for the position that the argument adopts; the second provides evidence to support that position.
E. The first offers justification for an assumption that is explicitly made in the argument; the second states that assumption.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.