Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
17%
(02:13)
correct 83%
(02:24)
wrong
based on 53
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In the 1970s, the British mathematician George Box quipped that ‘all models are wrong, but some are useful’. But today, many of the models we use to describe our social world are neither right nor useful. There is a better way. And it doesn’t entail a futile search for regular patterns in the maddening complexity of life. Instead, it involves learning to navigate the chaos of our social worlds.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author's argument?
A) Some models have been proven to predict social phenomena with a high degree of accuracy. B) There is a growing body of evidence that shows that understanding patterns in social behavior leads to better outcomes. C) Most experts agree that models are the best tool for understanding complex social systems. D) Navigating the chaos of social worlds is a process that involves applying regular patterns, which contradicts the author's view. E) Social models have helped drive positive societal change in specific real-world applications.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
To weaken the author's argument, We need to undermine the fact that the "We don't need to look for patterns rather learn to navigate through the chaos" .
D says "One needs to look for the patterns and apply them to navigate through the chaos" Therefore, D clearly undermines the author's view and IMO it should be D.
Moreover, B seems incorrect, because the argument does not mention about social behavior.
It's hard to write an explanation for this, since it is much more unclear and ambiguous than a real GMAT argument. However, notice that D says we need to APPLY patterns, and the author never opposed this. They just said that the way forward did not entail searching in vain for NEW patterns. That doesn't mean we couldn't apply any patterns that we did have available to us. Meanwhile, B is actively addressing the importance of LEARNING patterns. It's not much of a leap to say that our "social worlds" involve "social behavior." And remember that in general, a strengthen/weaken does not need to restrict itself to things that were mentioned. Neither does an assumption, if it rules out a complication that the argument didn't allow for. If a new idea has a clear effect on the argument--in this case, if it establishes that looking for patterns leads to better outcomes--then it works.
Having said that, I'll reiterate that this question needs tightening up. We shouldn't have to interpret vague statement such as "There is a better way" unless the argument is referring to a way to achieve a clearly-stated aim.
SHIVAM5795
To weaken the author's argument, We need to undermine the fact that the "We don't need to look for patterns rather learn to navigate through the chaos" .
D says "One needs to look for the patterns and apply them to navigate through the chaos" Therefore, D clearly undermines the author's view and IMO it should be D.
Moreover, B seems incorrect, because the argument does not mention about social behavior.
Show more
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.