Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT 
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
06 Jun 2025, 09:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
33% (01:47) correct
67%
(02:15)
wrong
based on 104
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
An analysis published in August by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison suggests the debunking messages posted by medical experts on TikTok are more effective if overlaid with high-tempo music. The academics believe the music helps swamp the brain’s ability to present counter-arguments, making the message more persuasive to the listener.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument regarding the effect of high-tempo music on the persuasiveness of debunking messages?
A) Viewers who dislike high-tempo music often skip debunking videos entirely.
B) The high-tempo music actually enhances viewers' cognitive focus on the message details, thereby reducing the formation of counter-arguments.
C) Studies show that high-tempo music increases emotional arousal, which independently enhances persuasion without reducing counter-arguments.
D) Medical experts choosing to use high-tempo music typically have backgrounds that make them better communicators.
E) High-tempo music often increases the likelihood of sharing these videos, expanding reach but with no direct effect on the message.
A) Irrelevant to the persuasiveness per viewer; addresses viewership but not the causal mechanism proposed for effectiveness.
B) This option actually supports the argument by confirming that music reduces counter-arguments, thereby aligning with rather than undermining the causality.
C) Effectively weakens by providing an alternative explanation for music's persuasive effect: independent emotional arousal that does not affect counter-arguments, thus challenging the proposed mechanism.
D) Introduces a confounding factor about communicator skill but fails to directly challenge the role of music in reducing counter-arguments; thus, it doesn't weaken the argument's specific claim.
E) Relates to sharing behavior and reach extension, not to the persuasiveness per viewer, so is irrelevant to the argument.
The argument credits music's persuasiveness specifically to its effect on reducing counter-arguments. To weaken this, we need an option that severs this causal link. Option C achieves this by showing the effect arises from emotional arousal independently, rendering the claimed mechanism unnecessary. Option B wrongly supports the mechanism. Options A, D, and E do not attack the causal relationship.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument regarding the effect of high-tempo music on the persuasiveness of debunking messages?
A) Viewers who dislike high-tempo music often skip debunking videos entirely.
B) The high-tempo music actually enhances viewers' cognitive focus on the message details, thereby reducing the formation of counter-arguments.
C) Studies show that high-tempo music increases emotional arousal, which independently enhances persuasion without reducing counter-arguments.
D) Medical experts choosing to use high-tempo music typically have backgrounds that make them better communicators.
E) High-tempo music often increases the likelihood of sharing these videos, expanding reach but with no direct effect on the message.
Show SpoilerHints
Focus on identifying the specific causal claim: that music increases persuasiveness BY reducing counter-arguments. Any option that supports this link, provides an alternative, or introduces unrelated factors must be evaluated. Beware distractors that may appear to weaken but actually strengthen the argument.
Show SpoilerExplanations
A) Irrelevant to the persuasiveness per viewer; addresses viewership but not the causal mechanism proposed for effectiveness.
B) This option actually supports the argument by confirming that music reduces counter-arguments, thereby aligning with rather than undermining the causality.
C) Effectively weakens by providing an alternative explanation for music's persuasive effect: independent emotional arousal that does not affect counter-arguments, thus challenging the proposed mechanism.
D) Introduces a confounding factor about communicator skill but fails to directly challenge the role of music in reducing counter-arguments; thus, it doesn't weaken the argument's specific claim.
E) Relates to sharing behavior and reach extension, not to the persuasiveness per viewer, so is irrelevant to the argument.
The argument credits music's persuasiveness specifically to its effect on reducing counter-arguments. To weaken this, we need an option that severs this causal link. Option C achieves this by showing the effect arises from emotional arousal independently, rendering the claimed mechanism unnecessary. Option B wrongly supports the mechanism. Options A, D, and E do not attack the causal relationship.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
06 Jun 2025, 09:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
Argument:
Music with high tempo along with Persuasive message > Decline in Ability of Counter Argument > Effectiveness of Counter Argument increases
Option B and Option C were remaining
Option B states that
As Cognitive Focus increases > Ability of Counter Argument Decreases > Persuasion Message increases.
It doesn't weaken at all.
Option C states that
Emotional arousal is the reason behind increased Persuasion and not Ability of Counter Argument
So Answer C IMO
NOT SURE IF THIS IS A PROPER WEAKEN QUESTION AS IT SOUNDS MORE LIKE A FLAW IN ARGUMENT QUESTION
KarishmaB need help
Music with high tempo along with Persuasive message > Decline in Ability of Counter Argument > Effectiveness of Counter Argument increases
Option B and Option C were remaining
Option B states that
As Cognitive Focus increases > Ability of Counter Argument Decreases > Persuasion Message increases.
It doesn't weaken at all.
Option C states that
Emotional arousal is the reason behind increased Persuasion and not Ability of Counter Argument
So Answer C IMO
NOT SURE IF THIS IS A PROPER WEAKEN QUESTION AS IT SOUNDS MORE LIKE A FLAW IN ARGUMENT QUESTION
KarishmaB need help
08 Jun 2025, 22:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
The question is acceptable and so is your analysis. It is a weaken question and the difference between weaken and flaw can blur sometimes. Don't worry too much about it. Answer as per exactly what is asked in the question. Here you are asked to weaken "High tempo Music reduces Ability of Counter Argument leading to better persuasion".
(C) says the high temp music increases emotional arousal without reducing counter argument ability. Hence it weakens the logic given by the argument.
(B) tells you how high tempo music reduces counter argument ability (by enhancing viewers' cognitive focus on the message details). It does not imply that counter argument ability is not reduced.
(C) is correct
(C) says the high temp music increases emotional arousal without reducing counter argument ability. Hence it weakens the logic given by the argument.
(B) tells you how high tempo music reduces counter argument ability (by enhancing viewers' cognitive focus on the message details). It does not imply that counter argument ability is not reduced.
(C) is correct
Aabhash777
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
