Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
20%
(05:08)
correct 80%
(01:21)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since the major proportion of all hospital-admitted patients in Normark suffer from smoking-related illnesses, and since addiction to nicotine prevents many people from quitting smoking, the government of Normark plans to reduce the maximum allowable quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. However, reducing the quantity of nicotine per cigarette will probably cause people addicted to nicotine to smoke more cigarettes. Therefore, implementing this plan is unlikely to make hospital beds more available.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly weakens the argument about the consequences of implementing the Normarkian government's plan?
(A) Over half of the nonsmoking adults in Normark have smoked cigarettes in the past.
(B) Most cigarettes currently sold in Normark contain somewhat less than the maximum amount of nicotine permitted by law.
(C) Inexpensive, smoke-free sources of nicotine, such as nicotine gum and nicotine skin patches, have recently become available in Normark.
(D) Most smokers in Normark already spend a large proportion of their income on cigarettes.
(E) The main cause of smoking-related illnesses is not nicotine but tar in cigarette smoke.
Quote:
This questions is a part of a series of questions based on small changes to OG questions that will change the logic completely.
Show more
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Since the major proportion of all hospital-admitted patients in Normark suffer from smoking-related illnesses, and since addiction to nicotine prevents many people from quitting smoking, the government of Normark plans to reduce the maximum allowable quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. However, reducing the quantity of nicotine per cigarette will probably cause people addicted to nicotine to smoke more cigarettes. Therefore, implementing this plan is unlikely to make hospital beds more available.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly weakens the argument about the consequences of implementing the Normarkian government's plan?
(A) Over half of the nonsmoking adults in Normark have smoked cigarettes in the past.
(B) Most cigarettes currently sold in Normark contain somewhat less than the maximum amount of nicotine permitted by law.
(C) Inexpensive, smoke-free sources of nicotine, such as nicotine gum and nicotine skin patches, have recently become available in Normark.
(D) Most smokers in Normark already spend a large proportion of their income on cigarettes.
(E) The main cause of smoking-related illnesses is not nicotine but tar in cigarette smoke.
Show more
We do not allow self-made questions on the forum. Thank you for understanding.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.