Last visit was: 09 May 2026, 20:57 It is currently 09 May 2026, 20:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 765
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 765
Kudos: 5,122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
kalpvriksha14
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Posts: 15
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
eyunni
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Last visit: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 248
Own Kudos:
Posts: 248
Kudos: 3,413
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 765
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 765
Kudos: 5,122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the OA is C. Why? here is the explanation: the argument concluded that Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created ONLY BECAUSE of the one fact that previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs as such companies did last year. We have no information about the new companies this year, yet the argument thought that the information about the established companies this year is enough to consider the trend of job creations as negative.

hope you guys enjoyed this!
avatar
kalpvriksha14
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Last visit: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Posts: 15
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yeah..the explanation is logical..infact should have spent more time on this one...nice question though !!!
User avatar
tarek99
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Last visit: 15 Feb 2026
Posts: 765
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 765
Kudos: 5,122
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
and the main reason why option b is wrong is that, we are dealing with an assumption question here. assumptions are never stated, so how can you choose an answer choice that is directly written in the text? see what I mean? an answer to the assumption question will never be stated in the argument, otherwise, how can it be assumed? if it is stated in the argument, then it is simply a premise.

hope this helps
User avatar
ncp
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 1,414
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Posts: 1,414
Kudos: 326
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/p277619#277619
User avatar
mich120
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Last visit: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why wouldn't A work? I am so bad at these!
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 857
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 857
Kudos: 7,628
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ncprasad
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

p277619#277619

ncprasad,

What is the role of X in the : "Total number of new jobs added this Year=New jobs added in existing companies[Last Year] - X + (Number of new companies)[This Year]*(Number of jobs per new company)[This Year]"

Gradually I understand this question! Many thanks
User avatar
ncp
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Last visit: 13 Feb 2023
Posts: 1,414
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Ann Arbor
Concentration: Health Care Marketing
Schools:Ross '10
Posts: 1,414
Kudos: 326
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow, this is a blast from the past. Good ole' GMAT days.

The argument says This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year.

The -X accounts for this decrease. Makes sense?

sondenso
ncprasad
For the Quant-minded, here is another way of looking at this CR.

https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/p277619#277619

ncprasad,

What is the role of X in the : "Total number of new jobs added this Year=New jobs added in existing companies[Last Year] - X + (Number of new companies)[This Year]*(Number of jobs per new company)[This Year]"

Gradually I understand this question! Many thanks



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
550 posts
363 posts