Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The new drug Prozac and the old one Elavil are about equally effective in treating various forms of depression, although patients on the newer drug may have slightly fewer side effects. Thus, revenue from the sale of the new drug is going to far exceed the revenue from the sale of the old drug.
All of the following statements weaken the conclusion of the argument above, EXCEPT:
(A) Elavil is also used as a powerful anti-emetic medicine. (B) The Drug Control Authorities in six states have refused to allow the sale of Prozac till some more tests are carried out. (C) Some side effects of Elavil are common to Prozac as well. (D) Prozac is not recommended as an anti-depressant for diabetics and heart patients. (E) The unit sale price of Elavil is higher than that of Prozac.
What would you pick ?
Suntaurian
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The new drug Prozac and the old one Elavil are about equally effective in treating various forms of depression, although patients on the newer drug may have slightly fewer side effects. Thus, revenue from the sale of the new drug is going to far exceed the revenue from the sale of the old drug.
All of the following statements weaken the conclusion of the argument above, EXCEPT:
(A) Elavil is also used as a powerful anti-emetic medicine. (B) The Drug Control Authorities in six states have refused to allow the sale of Prozac till some more tests are carried out. (C) Some side effects of Elavil are common to Prozac as well. (D) Prozac is not recommended as an anti-depressant for diabetics and heart patients. (E) The unit sale price of Elavil is higher than that of Prozac.
What would you pick ?
Suntaurian
Show more
Id prolly say C b/c it appears to be rather neutral.
A: reason why Elavil will be used more/ B reason why Elavil will be used more D: again another reason E: Im not too sure about this one, but I guess we could say the higher price leads to increased proft. OR the higher price leads to less profit and more ppl choose Prozac. So E is kinda iffy to me.
The new drug Prozac and the old one Elavil are about equally effective in treating various forms of depression, although patients on the newer drug may have slightly fewer side effects. Thus, revenue from the sale of the new drug is going to far exceed the revenue from the sale of the old drug.
All of the following statements weaken the conclusion of the argument above, EXCEPT:
(A) Elavil is also used as a powerful anti-emetic medicine. (B) The Drug Control Authorities in six states have refused to allow the sale of Prozac till some more tests are carried out. (C) Some side effects of Elavil are common to Prozac as well. (D) Prozac is not recommended as an anti-depressant for diabetics and heart patients. (E) The unit sale price of Elavil is higher than that of Prozac.
What would you pick ?
Suntaurian
Show more
I picked C at a glance because the fact that some side effects are common is totally irrelvant: we know that Prozac has fewer side effects and this is what we car for. anyway, after having answered the question, I thought E also sounded good. If Prozac costs less, then more people would buy it....anyway, we don't know if and how consumers are sensible to price. C is definetely the best answer choice.
(A) If it is used for another purpose, the Elavil keep pace with Prozac so this weakens the arguement. (B) If some states have refused to sell Prozac, then that weakens the arguement. (C) Correct...If both side effects are the same but Prozac has fewer side effects then we can assume that Prozac should sell better thus strengthening the conclusion. (D) If Prozac isn't recommended, then these patients may buy Elavil which would weaken the arguement. (E) This neither strengthen nor weakens the conclusion because although the unit prices are different, we don't know the quantity sold and the conclusion is focusing on revenue from sales.
Since this is a EXCEPT question lets rephrase the question: Following statement does not weaken the conclusion of the argument:
(A) Elavil is also used as a powerful anti-emetic medicine. [Hold it – This has no necessary correlation to the conclusion of the argument – hold it] (B) The Drug Control Authorities in six states have refused to allow the sale of Prozac till some more tests are carried out. [This weakens the argument – Eliminate it] (C) Some side effects of Elavil are common to Prozac as well. [Hold it – This has no direct effect on the conclusion of the argument – hold it] (D) Prozac is not recommended as an anti-depressant for diabetics and heart patients. [This may weaken the argument as the revenues from diabetic and heart patients are missed in this case – Eliminate it] (E) The unit sale price of Elavil is higher than that of Prozac. [This has direct effect on the conclusion, however can weaken the argument as unit price of Elavil is higher than Prozac – Eliminate it]
Struck between – A and C
One thumb rule – When we have two items compared in the argument, it is always better to select answer choices that somehow addresses the both issues]. Eliminate – A
Answer: C
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.