Last visit was: 14 May 2026, 22:17 It is currently 14 May 2026, 22:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
quangviet512
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Last visit: 11 Oct 2019
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
Posts: 74
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FN
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Last visit: 07 May 2012
Posts: 1,575
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: New York City
Concentration: Social Enterprise
Schools:Wharton'11 HBS'12
Posts: 1,575
Kudos: 687
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
alpha_plus_gamma
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Jun 2010
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
Concentration: MC, PE, VC
Posts: 298
Kudos: 641
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
diehard4
Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Last visit: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36
Kudos: 359
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am with A, since even if patients have stop using the product result will be evident only after some time so it will not stop perioral dermatitis immediately so it weakens the conculsion that there is "some other cause of perioral dermatitis besides reactions to SLS ‎must exist".
User avatar
[email protected]
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 956
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
'C' weakens the conclusion.
User avatar
domleon
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 22 May 2009
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 77
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i would also prefer A - since the others do not make sense!
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 857
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 857
Kudos: 7,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D for me!
User avatar
zoltan
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Last visit: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Hungary
Posts: 139
Kudos: 374
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think answer is C. My reason is that the argument only says that instructing people does not stop the problem.

Instructing people does not mean that they really stopped using the staffs. People enjoy using those shampoons and etc, therefore they will use them.


I hope my answer is good.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
566 posts
368 posts