The point of the passage is - The yellow-green color in VG's painting may be due to Drug Digitalis.
How is the author making this point? by providing evidences
A- not A because there is no clear indication of the cause(because VG used Drug Ditialis in his paintings) and the effect (the yellow green color in VG's paintings)
B- circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. It is the cirumstances that surrond the facts that can be used to prove a point. In our case- Dr's potrait happen to have the plant from which the drug is made. Therefore VG used it in his painting. a good try but is still too far fetched.
so B maybe.
C - yes, its clear that there is connection between Drug and VG's paintings but I am not convinced if that is strong evidence to prove the point.
D- I strongly feel that the author is proving the point by citing some form of documented evidence ( Dr's potrait with the plant from which the drug is made-Dr is VG's physician). Whether we are convinced is another issue but the author is making a point by citing specific documented facts.
E- is out of scope.
so between B and D, I tend to choose D