Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
The next question was the size of the okapi population. Because okapis were infrequently captured by hunters, some zoologists beleived that they were rare; however, others theorized that their habits simply kept them out of sight. It was not until 1985, when zoologists started tracking okapis by affixing collars equipped with radio transmitters to briefly captured specimens, that reliable information about okapi numbers and habits began to be collected. It turns out that while okapis are not as rare as some zoologists suspected, their population is concentrated in an extremely limited chain of forestland in northeastern central Africa, surrounded by savanna.
Quesition:
Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?
A) The number of okapis is many time larger thatn zoologists had previously believed it to be.
Is AC "A" a bad paraphrase of the bolded content? Or does the bolded concent traslate/equate to the AC A?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The next question was the size of the okapi population. Because okapis were infrequently captured by hunters, some zoologists beleived that they were rare; however, others theorized that their habits simply kept them out of sight. It was not until 1985, when zoologists started tracking okapis by affixing collars equipped with radio transmitters to briefly captured specimens, that reliable information about okapi numbers and habits began to be collected. It turns out that while okapis are not as rare as some zoologists suspected, their population is concentrated in an extremely limited chain of forestland in northeastern central Africa, surrounded by savanna.
Quesition:
Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?
A) The number of okapis is many time larger thatn zoologists had previously believed it to be.
Is AC "A" a bad paraphrase of the bolded content? Or does the bolded concent traslate/equate to the AC A?
Show more
I would say that AC A is not valid, and is not a good paraphrase of the content. To say that okapis are not as rare as some zoologists suspected in no way implies the much stronger statement,
The number of okapis is many times larger than zoologists [not qualified by "some"] had previously believed it to be
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.