The proposed ordinance on the Employees Provident Funds will

Question

The proposed ordinance on the Employees Provident Funds will give more regulatory teeth to the enforcement agencies,  widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors like construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs, who  may not be covered at all.

(A) widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors like construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs, who

(B) widening the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers who often change jobs and

(C) to widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs, that

(D) for widening the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help, to migratory laborers who often change jobs, and

(E) so as to widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs, which

saxenashobhit · Answer

IMO B
ambit of coverage to workers (...) and to migratory laborers (...)

(A) widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors like construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs,  who 
 I guess who is misplaced

(B) widening the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers who often change jobs and
 who often correctly describes laborers

(C) to widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs,  that 
 That gives a feeling that jobs are not covered. We are discussing that laboreres are not covered

(D) for widening the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help, to migratory laborers who often change jobs,  and 
 and is misplaced

(E) so as to widen the ambit of coverage to workers in the unorganized sectors such as construction and domestic help and to migratory laborers often changing jobs, which
 which incorrectly modifies laborers

shekharvineet · Answer

I go for B.
Correct use of parallelism "to workers....and to migratory labors...". Moreover, the phrase fits perfectly well as an -Ing form is best used to give the result of the main form.
A- Incorrect as "who" is misplaced.
C- Use of "that" is incorrect. Moreover, the use of infinitive is wrong.
D- The use of "for" is incorrect after a comma in this context. Also, and is kind of misplaced.
E- "so as to" is always incorrect. it should be "so+adjective+as+to+verb". Another error here is the use of "which" modifying the whole clause.

daagh · Answer

OA is B kudos to both

The proposed ordinance on the Employees Provident Funds will

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards