Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hi I stumbled on this sentence in the Knewton material
What religious historians understand about Sumerian creation myths comes from translations of the Eridu Genesis, a stone tablet found by the Euphrates River in 1914.
Here the subject is: What the religious historians understand Main verb: comes
My problem is with: a stone tablet found by the Euphrates River in 1914 ?
there is a noun "tablet" which could be the subject and a verb "found" - why isn´t this an independent clause ? (I believe it is an Appositive)
How can I become more accurate in identifying Appositives ? -ed or -ing form makes it comfortable to recognize as a modifier, is there any foolproof rule for appositives?
thanks
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
found is not a verb; it is a past participle; ‘a stone tablet found by the Euphrates River in 1914’ is a noun phrase defining the noun preceding it namely the Eridu Genesis.
An appositive is normally removed of the verb and hence will be found without a verb unless there are some rare exceptions, which I am not aware of. Hence , the best clue will be lack of verb provided you do not confuse participles with verbs
Hi I stumbled on this sentence in the Knewton material
What religious historians understand about Sumerian creation myths comes from translations of the Eridu Genesis, a stone tablet found by the Euphrates River in 1914.
Here the subject is: What the religious historians understand Main verb: comes
My problem is with: a stone tablet found by the Euphrates River in 1914 ?
there is a noun "tablet" which could be the subject and a verb "found" - why isn´t this an independent clause ? (I believe it is an Appositive)
How can I become more accurate in identifying Appositives ? -ed or -ing form makes it comfortable to recognize as a modifier, is there any foolproof rule for appositives?
thanks
Show more
"found" is a not verb here. The verb could have been of type "to be" such as "is, was etc" E.g. a stone tablet WAS found by the Euphrates River in 1914
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.