Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 09:59 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 09:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
amy_v
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Last visit: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Location: New York
Posts: 42
Kudos: 4
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
duttsit
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Kudos: 708
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
amy_v
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Last visit: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Location: New York
Posts: 42
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
duttsit
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Kudos: 708
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amy_v
Duttsit,

Thanks for the quick response. I kinda knew this explanation but I am lost when it comes to differentiating a restrictive clause from a non-restrictive clause. Here if I use 'which' won't it explain the blood alcohol level?

how do we differentiate a non restrictive clause from a restrictive one?

most of the time, non-restrictive clause begins with comma (,). As implied, it is supposed to give additional information but sentence neverthless is correct even when you ommit it. Restrictive clase, as in this case, are required for sentence to make sense.
User avatar
Bhai
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Last visit: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,018
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,018
Kudos: 867
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B.

Agree with duttsit's explaination. There is also a detailed explaination from Paul somewhere. I was unable to find out.
User avatar
rigger
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Last visit: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
Posts: 231
Kudos: 309
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The clause "constitutes drunk driving" should be a restrivtive clause; therefore, "that" should be used. We can eliminate d and e.

IMO, I believe "b" is wrong because "that constitutes drunk driving, ...." makes it look like non-restrivtive clasue.

I think the answer is A.

But since everyone is picking B over A, can someone explain to me why?
avatar
nshankaran
Joined: 31 May 2005
Last visit: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B is correct as another that in A seems redundant.
User avatar
desiguy
Joined: 11 May 2004
Last visit: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 275
Own Kudos:
Location: New York
Posts: 275
Kudos: 172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
that vs which

that is restrictive in the sentence and I gow ith B
User avatar
taquanghai
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Last visit: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone help me explain why withheld is suitable in B?
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amy_v
States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level that constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that witholds highway funds from those states that don't enforce the applicable standard.

b) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withholdsc) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withheld
d) which constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that withholds
e) which constitutes drunk driving because a federal law witholds


It is obvious that you have to make a choice between 'which' and 'that'. Please help me with the reason for your choice too.


taquanghai> you were reading C instead of B :wink: . Be careful coz the poster didn't re-type A in the answer choices :P

rigger> "States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level [u]that constitutes drunk driving[b] by a federal law" . The two bold parts look awkward if going together, don't they?! :wink: . A would be fine if it were " states are now given an incentive blah blah by the federal law....."
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,290
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I`ll go with (B). Because is necessary to properly complete the sentences intended meaning. S-V agreement: Federal law witholds



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts