Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 03:43 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 03:43

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 496
Own Kudos [?]: 660 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: CA
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 496
Own Kudos [?]: 660 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: CA
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
amy_v wrote:
Duttsit,

Thanks for the quick response. I kinda knew this explanation but I am lost when it comes to differentiating a restrictive clause from a non-restrictive clause. Here if I use 'which' won't it explain the blood alcohol level?

how do we differentiate a non restrictive clause from a restrictive one?

most of the time, non-restrictive clause begins with comma (,). As implied, it is supposed to give additional information but sentence neverthless is correct even when you ommit it. Restrictive clase, as in this case, are required for sentence to make sense.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1018
Own Kudos [?]: 728 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
B.

Agree with duttsit's explaination. There is also a detailed explaination from Paul somewhere. I was unable to find out.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 231
Own Kudos [?]: 297 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
The clause "constitutes drunk driving" should be a restrivtive clause; therefore, "that" should be used. We can eliminate d and e.

IMO, I believe "b" is wrong because "that constitutes drunk driving, ...." makes it look like non-restrivtive clasue.

I think the answer is A.

But since everyone is picking B over A, can someone explain to me why?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
B is correct as another that in A seems redundant.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 276
Own Kudos [?]: 154 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: New York
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
that vs which

that is restrictive in the sentence and I gow ith B
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
Can someone help me explain why withheld is suitable in B?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 833
Own Kudos [?]: 1481 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
amy_v wrote:
States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level that constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that witholds highway funds from those states that don't enforce the applicable standard.

b) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withholdsc) that constitutes drunk driving, because a federal law withheld
d) which constitutes drunk driving by a federal law that withholds
e) which constitutes drunk driving because a federal law witholds


It is obvious that you have to make a choice between 'which' and 'that'. Please help me with the reason for your choice too.


taquanghai> you were reading C instead of B :wink: . Be careful coz the poster didn't re-type A in the answer choices :P

rigger> "States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol level [u]that constitutes drunk driving[b] by a federal law" . The two bold parts look awkward if going together, don't they?! :wink: . A would be fine if it were " states are now given an incentive blah blah by the federal law....."
CEO
CEO
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 2887
Own Kudos [?]: 1117 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
I`ll go with (B). Because is necessary to properly complete the sentences intended meaning. S-V agreement: Federal law witholds



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: States now have an incentive to lower the blood alcohol [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne