Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Originally posted by rampuria on 19 Mar 2009, 05:19.
Last edited by rampuria on 19 Mar 2009, 09:46, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a0%
b0%
c0%
d0%
e0%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In a recent study on the connection between brain abnormalities and violent behavior, the researcher examined more than three hundred people who had engaged in unusually violent behavior toward friends and family members. In most of the people studied, the researcher found clues of brain abnormalities, including evidence of past brain injury and physical abnormality. The researcher concluded that evidence of brain abnormalities could be used to predict violent behavior.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researcher’s conclusion?
A. The incidence of brain abnormaiities in the generai popuiation is as high as that in the group examined.
B. The brain abnormaiities discovered in those studied are of two distinct kinds
C. A wide variety of vioient actions were exhibited by those studied.
D. Those studied in the experiment acted vioientiy toward strangers as well as toward peopie they knew.
E. The study drew its subjects from a large geographical area.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I got B. Rest all statements are strengthening the researcher’s conclusion.
A says the conclusion should be valid because the researcher’s study is true for general population (conclusion based on wide study's result).
C again describes a wide study especially the violent behavior.
D also shows the violent behavior.
and E can weaken the researcher’s conclusion because it doesn't specifies that the geographical area consist of large population. But again it shows a wide study (according to me), so it strengthens the conclusion.
And as B contradicts the conclusion, because the researchers' study has not taken the other part of the study into consideration.
In a recent study on the connection between brain abnormalities and violent behavior, the researcher examined more than three hundred people who had engaged in unusually violent behavior toward friends and family members. In most of the people studied, the researcher found clues of brain abnormalities, including evidence of past brain injury and physical abnormality. The researcher concluded that evidence of brain abnormalities could be used to predict violent behavior.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researcher’s conclusion?
A. The incidence of brain abnormaiities in the generai popuiation is as high as that in the group examined.
B. The brain abnormaiities discovered in those studied are of two distinct kinds
C. A wide variety of vioient actions were exhibited by those studied.
D. Those studied in the experiment acted vioientiy toward strangers as well as toward peopie they knew.
E. The study drew its subjects from a large geographical area.
Show more
A in my opinion.
A - this means that brain abnormality has nothing to do with the violent behaviour.
B - this could mean that brain abnormalities are a reason for the violent behaviour.
C - same as B.
D - violent because they have had brain injuries.
E - this means that the group represents the general population. Hence any conclusion drawn from this study can be easily applied to the general population.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.