Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
40%
(03:22)
correct 60%
(01:57)
wrong
based on 8
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Warsaw began to rebuild not only with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones that had been demolished.
A. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones B. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, as well as painstaking reconstructions of the old ones C. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones D. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones E. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but they also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones
Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink, displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses.
A. displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses B. a method to displace lower layers upward; reversing, in spring, the process C. as a displacement of lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses D. to displace lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses E. to displace lower layers upwards; reversing, in spring, the process
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Warsaw A & B are easily eliminated. E is eliminated because it is wrong grammar, it could have been a possibility if the sentence had used 'reconstructed'
Between C & D, I select C because it maintains the tone in the sentence 'injecting -> painstaking' and 'structures -> reconstructions'
Cold weather
B, C & E are easily eliminated. Between A & D, I would go with A because there is usage of 'to' twice in option D.
Warsaw began to rebuild not only with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones that had been demolished.
A. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones B. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, as well as painstaking reconstructions of the old ones C. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones D. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones E. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but they also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones
I agree there both D and C are contenders. And initially i went for D. But after having a close look, i think C is correct.
Let's look at D and C.
C. Warsaw began to rebuild not only brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones............ Here [b]painstaking is an adjective and also brand new is an adjective...[/b] so the as per the idiom not only x but also y, x and y are parallel.
D.Warsaw began to rebuild not only brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones.............. Here painstakingly is an adverb,but brand new is an adjective... so the as per the idiom not only x but also y, x and y are not parallel.
Warsaw began to rebuild not only with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones that had been demolished.
A. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones B. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, as well as painstaking reconstructions of the old ones C. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones D. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones E. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but they also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones
I agree there both D and C are contenders. And initially i went for D. But after having a close look, i think C is correct.
Let's look at D and C.
C. Warsaw began to rebuild not only brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones............ Here [b]painstaking is an adjective and also brand new is an adjective...[/b] so the as per the idiom not only x but also y, x and y are parallel.
D.Warsaw began to rebuild not only brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones.............. Here painstakingly is an adverb,but brand new is an adjective... so the as per the idiom not only x but also y, x and y are not parallel.
Show more
IMO C ...i agree with the above explanation. 'structures' and 'reconstructions' are parallel.
In case of 'cold weather - displaces' not 'cold weather - to displace' IMO A
Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink, displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses.
A. displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses B. a method to displace lower layers upward; reversing, in spring, the process C. as a displacement of lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses D. to displace lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses E. to displace lower layers upwards; reversing, in spring, the process
Use infinitive to show purpose and use gerund to show effect
As per the original sentence 'Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink' because of this lower layers get displaced upward.
Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink, to displace lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses
If you see D in the original sentence, you will see that sentence is messed up with 2 infinitive clauses. Meaning of the sentence is not clear. Therefore, D is not a correct answer.
RaviChandra
Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink, displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses.
A. displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses B. a method to displace lower layers upward; reversing, in spring, the process C. as a displacement of lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses D. to displace lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses E. to displace lower layers upwards; reversing, in spring, the process
Warsaw began to rebuild not only with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones that had been demolished.
A. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, and also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones – not idiomatic – should be “not only stg … but also stg…” - out B. with brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, as well as painstaking reconstructions of the old ones – not idiomatic, same as A C. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstaking reconstructions of the old ones – correct D. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones – not parallel – here we compare “brand-new structures” (noun) and “painstakingly reconstructing” (gerund) - out E. brand-new structures, injecting a much-needed boost to the local economy, but they also painstakingly reconstructing the old ones – not idiomatic and not parallel.
Cold weather causes surface waters to become dense and sink, displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses.
A. displacing lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses – correct as it is – “displacing” modifies the verb “causes”. After semicolon we should use a clause (that is a subject and a verb) and this sentence uses it – “…the process reverses” B. a method to displace lower layers upward; reversing, in spring, the process – “a method” modifies “weather”, but weather is not a method. Moreover, we don’t have a clause after semicolon here. C. as a displacement of lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses – awkward – weather causes … as a displacement… - doesn’t make sense for me - out D. to displace lower layers upward; in spring, the process reverses – “to displace” here means that cold weather does something to do something else. But how can this happen? If we spoke about a person who does stg to do stg else, that would make sense, but here…. E. to displace lower layers upwards; reversing, in spring, the process – the same as D plus wrong phrase after semicolon.
Show more
Please, underline the text in the original sentence! It’s very difficult to read without underlined portion!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.