That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excav

Question

That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating  of a 1000 year old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exists.

(A) That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating

(B) Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation

(C) Discovering Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating

(D) Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating

(E) The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation

daagh · Accepted Answer

A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating ---  This isn’t a bad sentence; only thing is that the use of excavating instead of the excavation is rather not elegant. When there is a popular noun odor a word, the gerund is not the ideal thing to use.

B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation --- figurines and has nearly doubled- SV erro r

C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating---  at the excavating is inelegant

D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating ---  figurines and has nearly doubled – SV error. 
 
E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation—right choice; it is the act of discovery that pushes the number and not the 21 figurines.  Correct expression. 
 
Although both ‘at the excavation’ and ‘during the excavation’ are correct depending upon the context, here ‘during excavation’ is better since the figurines were found during the period of excavation. At the excavation will allude to a specific place.

LogicGuru1 · Answer

ANSWER IS UNDISPUTED  OPTION E 
 
Look at the non underlined part, (which as per GMAT rule contains no error) and notice the linking verb   "HAS"    
 (Linking verbs such as "IS" "HAS" "BE" "BEING" "WAS" etc etc show a relationship between the subject and the complement)
 It clearly indicated that the complement must be  singular  because  "has"  is singular. 
So the subject of the sentence  CAN ONLY BE SINGULAR AND CANNOT BE PLURAL. 
In all option A,B,C,D  the subject is  figurines  , which is the plural of figure .... so none of them can be the correct options

In ONLY E in   subject of the sentence is discovery which is singular   and hence correctly links with "has"
A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating 
 WRONG SV - plural "figurines" + singular "has" --->INCORRECT 
B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation 
 WRONG SV - plural "figurines" + singular "has"---> INCORRECT 
C. Discovering Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating  
WRONG SV - plural "figurines" + singular "has" INCORRECT 
D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating 
 WRONG SV - plural "figurines" + singular "has"---> INCORRECT 
E. The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation 
  RIGHT Singular subject "DISCOVERY+singular linking verb "has" --->CORRECT

The     discovery     of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation of a 1000 year old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona,     has     nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exists.

anairamitch1804 · Answer

In option A ..  "that twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona."  Yes, this entire clause is the subject, and as it begins with "that" it's singular, agreeing with the verb "has." However, it's extraordinarily awkward to use such a long noun clause to begin a sentence. Furthermore, noun clauses rarely make sense as the subjects of transitive verbs, and are much more often the subjects of the verb "to be" than anything else. An example of a clear usage of a noun clause is this:

"That the problems are difficult is clear; what is interesting is how to answer them."

Both noun clauses ("that..." and "what...") are short and are the subject of the verb "to be" -- in the second part of the sentence, the first noun clause, "what...", is properly equated to another noun clause, "how...." Thus these are good sentences. The original one here, however, isn't ideal, and if there is a choice that uses a simple noun and modifiers instead of the long awkward noun clause to be the subject of "has doubled," as long as that choice makes no further errors, it will be the ideal choice.

Of the remaining choices, it's necessary to keep the subject singular, so that it agrees with the singular verb "has" that isn't underlined and therefore can't change. (B) and (D) both make the subject "figurines," which is plural, and therefore need to be eliminated.

(C) is awkward because gerunds are similar to noun clauses in that it's hard to make them logically the subject of transitive verbs -- was it really the act of "discovering" them? or rather the fact that they were discovered? -- and a noun, as in (E), would be far better. Furthermore, it's rarely correct to use a gerund after a preposition, so "at the excavating" in (C) should raise some eyebrows, while "during the excavation" in (E) is, again, far superior. 
Thus (E) is the correct answer.

CrackverbalGMAT · Answer

‘That’ is a demonstrative pronoun. But in this sentence, ‘that’ makes the clause into a noun clause which serves as the subject here.

The entire subject here then becomes the following: 
‘That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1000 year old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona,”

But you can see that the sentence feels awkward. IMO, if the structure was as follows, it would have made more sense:

That X … has doubled… is <something more>

But this is not the case here.  Eliminate Option A.

So let’s look at the other options.

Options B and D  have clear  Subject Verb Agreement errors . We cannot have ‘has’ with ‘figurines’.  Eliminate Options B and D.

In  Option C  – it is incorrect to say ‘discovering … at the  excavating ’. 
As  daagh  has already pointed out, when there is an accepted and common noun form, it is not advisable to use a gerund in its place.  Eliminate Option C.  
 
 Option E is the best choice.

Hope this helps!

ymba2020 · Answer

Thanks for the explanation. However, for option A, I believe the usage of 'has' is correct. As  anairamitch1804  mentioned in her reply that the 'That clause' takes up a singular verb, in this case 'has'. The problem with A seems to be the usage of the 'That clause'. A normal straight forward subject would be preferred over a 'That clause'. Also the word 'excavating' doesn't seem right, however I don't want to reject an option simply because it doesn't seem right.

Can you please let me know whether my thinking here is correct.

Thanks!

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excav

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excav

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards