Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Yes but make a wholesome call - not just based on pronoun ambiguity. If gmat has to muddy the correct answer - it will make it unattractive - Not the girl in the baywatch
If this sentence is in CR then I will assume that "it" is referring to extraterrestrial life.
noboru
The sentence is part of a CR passage, and when I saw it, I thought: "mmm...if this were a SC, there would be ambiguity??" Any more thoughts? Thanks,
to clarify, your sentence really doesn't make sense unless it [your sentence] is corrected by either the following:
This machine, searching for extraterrestrial life, will not find it.
In this example, i made the present participle + prepositional phrase modifier (searching for ET life) a nonessential (nonrestrictive) modifer. To do this, i need to specific the machine with the word This. [Note also that searching is NOT a gerund in this example; searching is serving as an adjective (present participle to be exact) that modifies machine.]
Or, you can correct the sentence by removing the comma:
A machine searching for extraterrestrial life will not find it.
It can be referred to machine or to life... ask the question: does it make sense to say, a machine will not find this machine? sounds quite funny, but still, it can be ambiguous even if it's quite obvious that the it should refer to life.
hope that helps
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.