Sajjad1994
About 80% of the ecosystem biomass of tropical rainforests occurs as woody tissues of trees, while only about 15% of the organic matter occurs in soil and litter, and about 5% is foliage. As with all forests, the biomass of animals is much less than 1% of that of the total ecosystem. In contrast, temperate forests maintain much larger fractions of their total ecosystem biomass as organic matter of the soil and forest floor. The reason for this difference is the relatively rapid rate of decomposition of dead biomass in the warm and humid environmental conditions of tropical rainforests. Because most of the biomass and nutrient content of tropical rainforests occurs in the biomass of living trees, and because their soils are usually highly infertile and extremely weathered, the fertility of this ecosystem is rapidly degraded after the forest is cleared.
Select
Strengthen for the statement that would, if true, most strengthen the argument, and select
Weaken for the statement that would, if true, most weaken the argument. Make only two selections, one in each column.
The passage begins with the explanation of tropical rainforest biomass split up:
80% of biomass = Woody tissues ( actually the huge trees of tropical forests)
15% of the biomass = Soil and litter
5% of the biomass = Foliage.
They bring a new entrant animals , which is LESS THAN 1% of the total ecosystem. What does this mean? The contribution of animals to the biomass ecosystem is negligible and can be discarded.
Next, TEMPERATE FOREST : MAJOR chunk of the the biomass belongs to Soil and forest floor.
Whats the reason for this contradiction:
decomposition rate is HIGH , in the tropical rainforests.
How can the decomposition rate be high ? As most biomass and nutrient is concentrated in the woody tissues , once logging of trees is done in the tropical rainforest- the major biomass chunk is removed out of the system. Leaving us with 20% of the biomass, which is infertile and can be weathered quickly.
May be due to rain runoff, or due to rapid decay these 20% can be expected to disintegrate soon. So, the CONCLUSION is
IF YOU CLEAR THE Tropical RAINFOREST , the fertility drops down. We need to find an answer , that strengthens and weakens the Conclusion.
The Options:
1. The rate of decomposition of biomass in warm and hot climates is one of the major contributors for the clearing of the equatorial forests.
Clearing of equatorial or any forest can be attributed to logging, rate of decomposition wild fires etc. so, this cannot be either a strengthener or weakening statement.
2. The soils of tropical rain forests are found to be poor in mineral content.
Yes, the soils of tropical rainforest can be found to be poor in mineral content. But what have caused the soil to be in such a poor state is what needs to be ascertained.
3. Temperate forests are far more enriched in fertility and wildlife diversity.
Does this option in either way impact the logging of trees in tropical forests and their consequences. Hence, Wrong.
4. The least contribution to biomass of forests is by the organic matter from soil.
This strengthens the view that biomass major contribution is attributed to something else - Woody tissues. If that’s true, then the logging of forest trees in the rainforest region would impact the decline of fertility. Hence, a valid strengthening option.
5. Most deserts that were once tropical forests are near coastal areas where salt content is very high in the air, affecting the ecosystems fertility.
This option mentions the tropical rainforest is usually located near the coastal areas, and the high salt content of the coastal areas is the causative factor for degradation of fertility of tropical rainforests. So, the logging of trees cannot be considered as the cause as mentioned in the conclusion. Hence, weakening option.