Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Jun 1101:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Jun 1111:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
TTP GMAT OnDemand gives serious students 400+ hours of expert video instruction, the full TTP course, AI support, weekly office hours, and a 715+ score guarantee—all built for elite GMAT score improvement.
Jun 1012:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Thought your job leaves no time for GMAT prep? After multiple GMAT attempts and a demanding consulting job, Kshitij improved to 695 in under 2 months. Learn the mindset shifts, study strategy, and execution changes that made the breakthrough possible.
Jun 1006:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..- Jun 10
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Scoring 715 on the GMAT Focus Edition requires more than just learning formulas, memorizing concepts, or solving hundreds of questions. In this episode, Nishant shares how he improved his GMAT preparation by focusing on application of concepts, and more. 
Jun 1603:00 PM PDT
-04:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Jun 2207:30 PM EDT
-09:30 PM EDT
Master the GMAT with expert live instruction, a personalized study plan, and real-time support. Includes 40 hours of online classes plus 6 months of access to the TTP GMAT OnDemand video course. Class date: Mon/Wed June 22, 2026 →August 26, 2026
A city's planning committee is allocating infrastructure development funds among four geographical areas. The committee evaluated each area with respect to each of the following aspects:
Each area received a rating from A+ to E for each aspect evaluated. Letters earlier in the alphabet represent higher ratings. A plus following a letter indicates a slightly higher rating than the letter alone, while a minus indicates a slightly lower rating.
- the state of existing infrastructure
- capacity for economic development
- readiness for economic development
- projected 25-year level of economic growth
- likely percentage return on investment (ROI) in infrastructure
Each area received a rating from A+ to E for each aspect evaluated. Letters earlier in the alphabet represent higher ratings. A plus following a letter indicates a slightly higher rating than the letter alone, while a minus indicates a slightly lower rating.
Area 2: Yes
Area 3: Yes
Area 4: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
93% (01:58) correct
7%
(02:32)
wrong
based on 1043
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
1. For each of the following areas, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the area's projected 25-year economic growth received a higher rating than that of Area 1. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| Area 2 | ||
| Area 3 | ||
| Area 4 |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Area 2: Yes
Area 3: Yes
Area 4: No
Mr. Hernandez: Yes
Mr. Li: No
Ms. Tansey: Yes
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
78% (01:56) correct
22%
(02:24)
wrong
based on 1157
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
2. For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| Mr. Hernandez | ||
| Mr. Li | ||
| Ms. Tansey |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Mr. Hernandez: Yes
Mr. Li: No
Ms. Tansey: Yes
Rating E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
76% (01:03) correct
24%
(01:08)
wrong
based on 1097
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
3. The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?
| Rating A | |
| Rating B | |
| Rating C | |
| Rating D | |
| Rating E |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Rating E
Attachment:
3.jpg [ 89.43 KiB | Viewed 12048 times ]
Solving this question helps.
Taking a timed set of similar questions in
GMAT Club Forum Quiz →
is even better.
03 Oct 2021, 03:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q1: 1. For each of the following areas, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the area's projected 25-year economic growth received a higher rating than that of Area 1. Otherwise, select No.
Projected 25-year economic growth:
Area 2: B vs C+ = Yes
Area 3: A+ vs C+ = Yes
Area 4: E vs C+ = No
2. For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.
Mr. Hernandez: B vs B- = Yes
Mr. Li: B vs D = No & B vs A+ = No
Ms. Tansey: A vs C+ = Yes & C vs D = Yes
3. The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?
Ms. Wahid argued that areas that are expected to yield a larger percentage return on infrastructure investment should have a higher priority
Area 4 - > readiness for economic development: E
Projected 25-year economic growth:
Area 2: B vs C+ = Yes
Area 3: A+ vs C+ = Yes
Area 4: E vs C+ = No
2. For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.
Mr. Hernandez: B vs B- = Yes
Mr. Li: B vs D = No & B vs A+ = No
Ms. Tansey: A vs C+ = Yes & C vs D = Yes
3. The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?
Ms. Wahid argued that areas that are expected to yield a larger percentage return on infrastructure investment should have a higher priority
Area 4 - > readiness for economic development: E
DhruvBadaya
Joined: 27 Feb 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Schools: IIMA '25 (II)
02 Mar 2024, 03:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
ANSWER 1
For each of the following areas, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the area's projected 25-year economic growth received a higher rating than that of Area 1. Otherwise, select No.
Area 2: Yes
Area 3: Yes
Area 4: No
The answer is Yes for Area 2 and Area 3 because the passage states that both of these areas received a higher rating for projected 25-year economic growth than Area 1. The answer is No for Area 4 because the passage does not mention the rating for Area 4's projected 25-year economic growth relative to Area 1.
ANSWER 2
For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.
Mr. Hernandez: Yes
Mr. Li: No
Ms. Tansey: Yes
Mr. Hernandez: Mr. Hernandez argued for prioritizing allocation of funding to the areas that received higher overall ratings from the committee. Since Area 2 has a higher overall rating (B) than Area 3 (B-), Mr. Hernandez would likely give Area 2 a greater priority.
Mr. Li: Mr. Li argued for prioritizing allocation of funding based on need, determined as follows: the lower the rating for the state of existing infrastructure and the higher the rating for projected 25-year economic growth, the greater the need. Because Area 3 has a lower rating for state of existing infrastructure (D) than Area 2 (B), and a higher rating for projected 25-year economic growth (A+) than Area 2 (B), Mr. Li would likely give Area 3 a greater priority.
Ms. Tansey: Ms. Tansey argued for prioritizing allocation of funding to areas that have been given higher ratings for both capacity and readiness for economic development. Since Area 2 has a higher rating for economic development readiness (C) than Area 3 (C-), Ms. Tansey would also likely give Area 2 a greater priority.
ANSWER 3
The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?
Ms. Wahid argued that areas that are expected to yield a larger percentage return on infrastructure investment should have a higher priority. Hence, highest priority will be given to Area 4, with the rating E.
Hence, answer is Rating E
For each of the following areas, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the area's projected 25-year economic growth received a higher rating than that of Area 1. Otherwise, select No.
Area 2: Yes
Area 3: Yes
Area 4: No
The answer is Yes for Area 2 and Area 3 because the passage states that both of these areas received a higher rating for projected 25-year economic growth than Area 1. The answer is No for Area 4 because the passage does not mention the rating for Area 4's projected 25-year economic growth relative to Area 1.
ANSWER 2
For each of the following committee members, select Yes if the information provided suggests that the member would probably give Area 2 a greater priority over Area 3 for infrastructure funding. Otherwise, select No.
Mr. Hernandez: Yes
Mr. Li: No
Ms. Tansey: Yes
Mr. Hernandez: Mr. Hernandez argued for prioritizing allocation of funding to the areas that received higher overall ratings from the committee. Since Area 2 has a higher overall rating (B) than Area 3 (B-), Mr. Hernandez would likely give Area 2 a greater priority.
Mr. Li: Mr. Li argued for prioritizing allocation of funding based on need, determined as follows: the lower the rating for the state of existing infrastructure and the higher the rating for projected 25-year economic growth, the greater the need. Because Area 3 has a lower rating for state of existing infrastructure (D) than Area 2 (B), and a higher rating for projected 25-year economic growth (A+) than Area 2 (B), Mr. Li would likely give Area 3 a greater priority.
Ms. Tansey: Ms. Tansey argued for prioritizing allocation of funding to areas that have been given higher ratings for both capacity and readiness for economic development. Since Area 2 has a higher rating for economic development readiness (C) than Area 3 (C-), Ms. Tansey would also likely give Area 2 a greater priority.
ANSWER 3
The area that Ms. Wahid would prefer to receive top priority for infrastructure funding received which one of the following ratings for its readiness for economic development?
Ms. Wahid argued that areas that are expected to yield a larger percentage return on infrastructure investment should have a higher priority. Hence, highest priority will be given to Area 4, with the rating E.
Hence, answer is Rating E
