Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
91%
(01:30)
correct 9%
(02:06)
wrong
based on 357
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Data Insights (DI) Butler 2023-24 [Question #117, Date: Nov-16-2023] [Click here for Details]
Attachment:
14.jpg [ 31.76 KiB | Viewed 6614 times ]
The graph shows the results of an investigation to determine the relationship (if any) between leaf area and exposure to light for two species of plant. The plants were grown under identical conditions apart from the light intensity to which they were exposed. The points on the graph represent the average leaf areas for twenty full-grown leaves at each level of light exposure.
A scientist could best conclude that for Species A there is correlation between leaf area and light intensity.
The light intensity that apparently results in the greatest difference in leaf areas between the two species is units.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the dropdowns, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Hi Sajjad1994 Can you please explain why answer to question 1 is Positive? My reason - For species A I can see that First when Light intensity increases, Leaf area increase but In between I can also see that when Light intensity increases, Leaf area decreases. Therefore, there is no correlation.
Drawing curves that best fit the data show that for species A there is a clear trend towards greater light intensity producing greater leaf area hence we have a positive correlation between the two parameters.
The difference between the two cures is greatest at 2.5 units of light intensity. If we extrapolate the curves it looks as though there would be an even bigger difference at 6 units, but we cannot be sure where the cures will go at levels above 5 as no data is provided. It is possible, for example, that curve A will plateau at 5.
Can you please explain why answer to question 1 is Positive? My reason - For species A I can see that First when Light intensity increases, Leaf area increase but In between I can also see that when Light intensity increases, Leaf area decreases. Therefore, there is no correlation.
Show more
To check the correlation, we can choose the points, which are in the Majority (Those that behave in a similar fashion). In the case of A, there are only a few points that don't show the correlation. IMO, we can safely call them outliers and ignore them to draw the best-fit curve.
Watch the video below on How to draw a line of best fit-