Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 07:07 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 07:07

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33036 [1]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2023
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 78
Location: India
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33036 [0]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
The graph shows the results of an investigation to determine the relat [#permalink]
Hi Sajjad1994
Can you please explain why answer to question 1 is Positive?
My reason - For species A I can see that First when Light intensity increases, Leaf area increase but In between I can also see that when Light intensity increases, Leaf area decreases. Therefore, there is no correlation.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33036 [0]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: The graph shows the results of an investigation to determine the relat [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Official Explanation

Drawing curves that best fit the data show that for species A there is a clear trend towards greater light intensity producing greater leaf area hence we have a positive correlation between the two parameters.

The difference between the two cures is greatest at 2.5 units of light intensity. If we extrapolate the curves it looks as though there would be an even bigger difference at 6 units, but we cannot be sure where the cures will go at levels above 5 as no data is provided. It is possible, for example, that curve A will plateau at 5.

Answer: Positive and 2.5
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2019
Status:GMAT Club Team member
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [0]
Given Kudos: 1003
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 1: 430 Q31 V19
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.26
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
The graph shows the results of an investigation to determine the relat [#permalink]
Nikita45 wrote:
Can you please explain why answer to question 1 is Positive?
My reason - For species A I can see that First when Light intensity increases, Leaf area increase but In between I can also see that when Light intensity increases, Leaf area decreases. Therefore, there is no correlation.


To check the correlation, we can choose the points, which are in the Majority (Those that behave in a similar fashion). In the case of A, there are only a few points that don't show the correlation. IMO, we can safely call them outliers and ignore them to draw the best-fit curve.

Watch the video below on How to draw a line of best fit-

GMAT Club Bot
The graph shows the results of an investigation to determine the relat [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92995 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1030 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11185 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne