Last visit was: 02 May 2026, 00:38 It is currently 02 May 2026, 00:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 16,754
Own Kudos:
51,997
 [18]
Given Kudos: 6,342
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,754
Kudos: 51,997
 [18]
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shreygo
Joined: 08 Jun 2023
Last visit: 18 Mar 2026
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 3
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 16,754
Own Kudos:
51,997
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6,342
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,754
Kudos: 51,997
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 484
Own Kudos:
492
 [2]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 484
Kudos: 492
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2009
  • Students: 632
  • Parents: 416
  • Teachers: 147
2011
  • Students: 676
  • Parents: 407
  • Teachers: 153
­In 2009, the city’s schools received an average rating of 7.0 among all survey responders in the category of Engagement. => No

Total ratings for Engagement in 2009 = (6.4 * 632) + (7.4 * 416) + (7.2 * 147) 
  • Total number of students (with rating 6.4 < 7) i.e. 632 is more than total number of parents + teachers (ratings 7.4 and 7.2, both > 7) i.e. 563 (=416+147)
  • 6.4 is more far away from 7 than 7.2 or 7.4
=> Avg < 7


If in 2011 the schools received a rating below 7.0 in a particular category, there is a 67% probability that this rating was given by students. => Yes

In 2011:
For Academic Expectations & Safety and Respect: all ratings are > 7
For Communication: Students and Teachers give ratings < 7
For Engagement: Students give ratings <7


In 2011, the average rating that the city’s schools were given by students and teachers combined for Academic Expectations was greater than the rating the schools were given for Academic Expectations by parents. => No

Avg for Academic Expectations in 2011, by Students & Teachers: (7.5 * 676) + (8.2 * 153) = 7.61
Avg for Academic Expectations in 2011, by Parents: 7.8 
User avatar
gullyboy09
Joined: 13 Oct 2025
Last visit: 02 May 2026
Posts: 153
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Products:
Posts: 153
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Sajjad1994, Bunuel, I chose no for the second part as 2/3 is 66.67%, and not 67%, and in option it wasn't mentioned that we need to approximate it.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Graphs and Tables (G&T) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
215 posts