|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
19 Dec 2024, 22:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
37% (00:43) correct
62% (01:37) wrong based on 8 sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The doctor’s presentation went into great detail about the supposed __________ of the treatment, but failed to discuss any way of obviating damage to auxiliary structures.
A. diagnosis
B. mien
C. prognosis
D. costs
E. benefits
A. diagnosis
B. mien
C. prognosis
D. costs
E. benefits
24 Dec 2024, 10:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
OE
The reversal signal here is “but,” and the rest of the proof is that the doctor “failed to discuss any way of obviating (anticipating and preventing) damage.” Thus, the doctor went into great detail about only “supposed” good things about the treatment, and only benefits works. Diagnosis (determination of disease) and prognosis (forecast of medical outcome; chances of recovery) both relate to the medical theme, but neither fits in the blank. Mien (appearance, bearing) is unrelated.
Answer: E
The reversal signal here is “but,” and the rest of the proof is that the doctor “failed to discuss any way of obviating (anticipating and preventing) damage.” Thus, the doctor went into great detail about only “supposed” good things about the treatment, and only benefits works. Diagnosis (determination of disease) and prognosis (forecast of medical outcome; chances of recovery) both relate to the medical theme, but neither fits in the blank. Mien (appearance, bearing) is unrelated.
Answer: E
