|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
01 Sep 2025, 09:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
80% (00:35) correct
20% (00:07) wrong based on 5 sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
There was much to admire about the singer’s voice, but her abilities as a performer were not as (i) _________ as those of the singer who followed, whose stage presence was far more (ii) _________ .
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) |
| A. unremarkable | D. charismatic |
| B. hackneyed | E. pedestrian |
| C. arresting | F. experienced |
Updated on: 05 May 2026, 07:40
Originally posted by Sajjad1994 on 21 Sep 2025, 03:43.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 05 May 2026, 07:40, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Sajjad1994 on 05 May 2026, 07:40, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Explanation
The first singer is good “but” she is not as good as the next singer; the first blank requires a positive word. Only “arresting” (impressive) fits. Both “unremarkable” and “hackneyed” (trite or unoriginal) are negative. If the first singer is not as good, then the second singer is better, so the latter’s stage presence must be much better. “Pedestrian” (unremarkable) doesn’t fit, but both “charismatic” and “experienced” are fairly positive words. Here, there are two ways to eliminate “experienced.” First, while you might call the singer herself “experienced,” the target of this blank is the singer’s “stage presence,” which cannot be properly described as “experienced.”
Second, “arresting,” the correct choice for blank (i), aligns very well with a “charismatic” stage presence.
Answer: C,D
The first singer is good “but” she is not as good as the next singer; the first blank requires a positive word. Only “arresting” (impressive) fits. Both “unremarkable” and “hackneyed” (trite or unoriginal) are negative. If the first singer is not as good, then the second singer is better, so the latter’s stage presence must be much better. “Pedestrian” (unremarkable) doesn’t fit, but both “charismatic” and “experienced” are fairly positive words. Here, there are two ways to eliminate “experienced.” First, while you might call the singer herself “experienced,” the target of this blank is the singer’s “stage presence,” which cannot be properly described as “experienced.”
Second, “arresting,” the correct choice for blank (i), aligns very well with a “charismatic” stage presence.
Answer: C,D
04 May 2026, 19:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think your explanation is for a different question
Sajjad1994
