Is 3 a factor of the positive integer m?

Question

(1) 12 is a factor of 25m
(2) 12 is a factor of 15m

jaxndaxt145 · Answer

imo A

1) m must have factor of 3 if 25 m is divisble by 12 because 12 has factor of 3 & 4 and 25 has neither so the 3 must come from m'
2) m could or could not have a factor of 3 if 15m is divisible by 12 because 15 has a factor of 3 & 5 and 12 has a factor for 4 & 3 so the factor of 3 could be coming from the 15 not from the m.

Bunuel · Answer

Is 3 a factor of the positive integer m?

(1) 12 is a factor of 25m --> 25m is a multiple of 12 --> 25m is a multiple of 3. Since 25 is NOT a multiple of 3, then in order for 25m to be a multiple of 3, m must be a multiple of 3. Sufficient.

(2) 12 is a factor of 15m --> 15m is a multiple of 12 --> 15m is a multiple of 3. Since 15 IS a multiple of 3, then in order for 15m to be a multiple of 3, m is not necessary to be a multiple of 3 (but it may as well be). Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

EMPOWERgmatRichC · Answer

Hi All,

This type of question can be solved by using 'prime factorization.' Before getting into the specifics of this question, here's how prime factorization "works"....

For a number to be a FACTOR of another number, the larger number has to have the same "prime pieces" that the smaller number has.

For example...
10 is a factor of 30 because....
10 = (2)(5) and 30 = (2)(3)(5)

Notice how 30 has a "2" and a "5"? That's why 10 is a factor of 30

10 is NOT a factor of 35 though, because....
10 = (2)(5) and 35 = (5)(7)

Notice how 35 does NOT have the "2" that we need? That's why 10 is NOT a factor of 35.

This same principle is at play in this question. We just have to account for the variable M and what it MUST (or MAY) contain.

We're asked if 3 is a factor of the positive integer M. So this question is really asking "when we prime factor M, is there a "3" in there?" This is a YES/NO question.

Fact 1: 12 is a factor of 25M

Using the above "steps", we know....
12 = (2)(2)(3)
25M = (5)(5)(M)

Since we're told that 12 IS a factor of 25M, the "2", the other "2" and the "3" have to be somewhere. They MUST be in the M. This means that the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT.

Fact 2: 12 is a factor of 15M

12 = (2)(2)(3)
15M = (3)(5)(M)

Here, since 12 is a factor of 15M, the "2" and the other "2" MUST be in the M, but there's already a "3" there. If there's ANOTHER "3" in the M, then the answer to the question is YES. But there might not be one in there; in that case, the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT.

Final Answer:  A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Lucky2783 · Answer

(1) 12 is a factor of 25m ; as 12 and 25 doesnt have any factor in common (except 1) so m surely has 12 in it. SUFFICIENT. 
(2) 12 is a factor of 15m  as 15 and 12 share 3 as acommon factor so m may ot my not have 3 in it . INSUFFICIENT.

answer a

stonecold · Answer

Here From statement 1 => m=12*P for some integer P
so m/3 must be an integer so => sufficient
from statement 2 => m=4*P so m/3 may or may not be an integer .
hence A

BrentGMATPrepNow · Answer

Target question :    Is 3 a factor of the positive integer m?

This is a good candidate for  rephrasing the target question .

-----ASIDE---------------------
A lot of integer property questions can be solved using prime factorization. 
For questions involving divisibility, divisors, factors and multiples, we can say:

If N is a factor by k, then k is "hiding" within the prime factorization of N

Consider these examples: 
 3  is a factor of 24, because 24 = (2)(2)(2) (3) , and we can clearly see the  3  hiding in the prime factorization. 
Likewise,  5  is a factor of 70 because 70 = (2) (5) (7)
And  8  is a factor of 112 because 112 = (2) (2)  (2)  (2) (7)
And  15  is a factor of 630 because 630 = (2)(3) (3)  (5) (7)
-----BACK TO THE QUESTION!---------------------

The above concept allows us to REPHRASE the target question as...
  REPHRASED target question :    Is there a 3 hiding in the prime factorization of m?

Statement 1 : 12 is a factor of 25m  
12 = (2)(2)(3)
In other words, statement 1 is telling us that there are two 2's and one 3 hiding in the prime factorization of 25m
25m = (5)(5)(m)
Since there are no 3's hiding in (5)(5), it must be the case that  there's a 3 hiding in the prime factorization of m 
Since we can answer the  REPHRASED target question  with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2 : 12 is a factor of 15m  
12 = (2)(2)(3)
In other words, statement 2 is telling us that there are two 2's and one 3 hiding in the prime factorization of 15m
15m = ( 3 )(5)(m)
As we can see, we already have a 3 hiding in the prime factorization of 15m, so we can't say for sure whether there's a 3 hiding in the prime factorization of m. 
To more certain, consider these two counter-examples: 
 Case a : m = 4. This means 15m = (15)(4) = 60, and 12 IS a factor of 60. In this case,  3 is NOT a factor of m 
 Case b : m = 12. This means 15m = (15)(12) = 180, and 12 IS a factor of 180. In this case,  3 IS a factor of m 
Since we cannot answer the  target question  with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Is 3 a factor of the positive integer m?

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia