|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
20 Sep 2008, 19:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
I am thinking about both the school. Here is my profile
GMAT: 690
Work Ex: 9 Yrs. (7.5 Yrs. International US,UK,Finland,Sweden,Taiwan)
Field: IT
Economist and FT ranking place both the schools in good standing within UK. While Economist put Cranfield above, the case reverses in case of FT.
Post MBA I will prefer to continue in IT with some consulting role, however, my long term goal is to be a social entrepreneur.
Although I will also try Cambridge, I think given my Indian background 690 is too low.
Any suggestions welcome.
GMAT: 690
Work Ex: 9 Yrs. (7.5 Yrs. International US,UK,Finland,Sweden,Taiwan)
Field: IT
Economist and FT ranking place both the schools in good standing within UK. While Economist put Cranfield above, the case reverses in case of FT.
Post MBA I will prefer to continue in IT with some consulting role, however, my long term goal is to be a social entrepreneur.
Although I will also try Cambridge, I think given my Indian background 690 is too low.
Any suggestions welcome.
20 Sep 2008, 23:54
Kudos
Bookmarks
Manchester has more recognition world-wide than Cranfield (though Cranfield is highly regarded in the UK).
Not sure how good they are for IT consulting
Not a very helpful reply but mt 2 cents.
cheers
Not sure how good they are for IT consulting
Not a very helpful reply but mt 2 cents.
cheers
