Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
07 Jun 2011, 14:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
I just took the GMAT this morning and got a 770, after practically having a panic attack about the test two days ago. If I weren't getting married in two months and hoping to apply in round 1 this year, I probably would have postponsed the test given how freaked out I was. I'm definitely glad I didn't end up doing that.
My experience:
I've always used tutors to prepare for standardized tests (i.e., when my parents were paying for it), but I studied on my own for the GMAT. I started studying in February for an hour or so a day after work, and started putting in several hours a day about three weeks ago. I used both the Manhattan GMAT and Princeton Review books to study. I first went through all of the Manhattan GMAT books, taking notes on the chapters and doing all the recommended practice problems. I did not take a practice test until after finishing the Manhattan books, because I only want to take the two official GMAC practice tests. Having taken the GRE for my previous masters, I felt that the tests created by other services were not a great indicator of how I'd score on the real thing if I took it that day. They might be worthwhile just to get comfortable taking a test on a computer screen (having taken the GRE I didn't feel this was necessary for me). I scored a 760 on my first practice test, getting 11 quant questions wrong and 1 verbal question and decided to spend the last month focusing on quant.
To complement the information I learned in the Manhattan GMAT books, I got the Princeton Review book. The Manhattan GMAT books are good for learning the material; the Princeton Review book is helpful for learning test-taking strategies and just generally remembering that this is a game to be beaten and not a reflection of your intelligence. After relentlessly hammering the quant for a month, I took a second practice test and got a 700; this time I got 10 quant questions wrong and 10 verbal wrong. This is the point at which I had a bit of a meltdown because I felt like I hadn't gotten anywhere in studying the math and was just getting worse in verbal. I realized I couldn't just neglect the verbal (I probably did worse because it wasn't fresh in my mind) and probably just needed to take a couple days off before the test to relax and not burn out. After taking a bit of a breather but still not feeling quite confident on the math, I was very pleasantly surprised at my score!
In summary I would say:
1) The Manhattan GMAT books are probably useful if you really need to learn the material (you struggled with math and haven't taken it since high school, you're a non-native english speaker and need help with idioms, etc). Otherwise I felt the books were somewhat overwhelming and just made me more nervous about the amount of material I was expected to know. I didn't have any questions on the test where I thought "I learned how to do this from Manhattan GMAT"
2) It really helps to relax for a day or two before the test. The amount of information you can cram into your head in one day is not as useful as being able to go into the test refreshed and in the right mindset.
3) Don't neglect your strengths to just focus on your weaknesses as you'll end up being rusty on your stronger subjects. You don't need to spend equal amounts of time on everything, but if you're great at geometry, you should still go over some geometry problems every once and a while to stay on top of it
Good luck to those of you who haven't yet taken the GMAT or are taking it again!
My experience:
I've always used tutors to prepare for standardized tests (i.e., when my parents were paying for it), but I studied on my own for the GMAT. I started studying in February for an hour or so a day after work, and started putting in several hours a day about three weeks ago. I used both the Manhattan GMAT and Princeton Review books to study. I first went through all of the Manhattan GMAT books, taking notes on the chapters and doing all the recommended practice problems. I did not take a practice test until after finishing the Manhattan books, because I only want to take the two official GMAC practice tests. Having taken the GRE for my previous masters, I felt that the tests created by other services were not a great indicator of how I'd score on the real thing if I took it that day. They might be worthwhile just to get comfortable taking a test on a computer screen (having taken the GRE I didn't feel this was necessary for me). I scored a 760 on my first practice test, getting 11 quant questions wrong and 1 verbal question and decided to spend the last month focusing on quant.
To complement the information I learned in the Manhattan GMAT books, I got the Princeton Review book. The Manhattan GMAT books are good for learning the material; the Princeton Review book is helpful for learning test-taking strategies and just generally remembering that this is a game to be beaten and not a reflection of your intelligence. After relentlessly hammering the quant for a month, I took a second practice test and got a 700; this time I got 10 quant questions wrong and 10 verbal wrong. This is the point at which I had a bit of a meltdown because I felt like I hadn't gotten anywhere in studying the math and was just getting worse in verbal. I realized I couldn't just neglect the verbal (I probably did worse because it wasn't fresh in my mind) and probably just needed to take a couple days off before the test to relax and not burn out. After taking a bit of a breather but still not feeling quite confident on the math, I was very pleasantly surprised at my score!
In summary I would say:
1) The Manhattan GMAT books are probably useful if you really need to learn the material (you struggled with math and haven't taken it since high school, you're a non-native english speaker and need help with idioms, etc). Otherwise I felt the books were somewhat overwhelming and just made me more nervous about the amount of material I was expected to know. I didn't have any questions on the test where I thought "I learned how to do this from Manhattan GMAT"
2) It really helps to relax for a day or two before the test. The amount of information you can cram into your head in one day is not as useful as being able to go into the test refreshed and in the right mindset.
3) Don't neglect your strengths to just focus on your weaknesses as you'll end up being rusty on your stronger subjects. You don't need to spend equal amounts of time on everything, but if you're great at geometry, you should still go over some geometry problems every once and a while to stay on top of it
Good luck to those of you who haven't yet taken the GMAT or are taking it again!
07 Jun 2011, 17:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
I've always been strong in math (econ major, masters in quantitative psych, etc) so I'm not sure how useful my tips are. But what worked for me was to create an error log so I could see what kinds of problems I was missing and why I was missing them. For example, I found that I tended to do the right work but would answer the wrong question, so I had to learn to go back on word problems and make sure I answered the question. I also think it's best to just do the official problems. I would get nervous when I couldn't answer a sample question in the Manhattan GMAT book, even if it wasn't an accurate reflection of the kind of questions I would get on test day. For me this was particularly true with probability. The Manhattan example questions in the Advanced Probability/Combinatorics chapter were impossible as far as I was concerned (which is really sad given that I've taken a year of grad level statistics/probability), but I didn't see anything remotely that hard on the real test.
