AjiteshArun
WayneHam
I scored 36 on the Quant and 40 on the Verbal. I have a science background so the Quant score is sooo bad. I scored 670 on the free practice exam but everyone scores higher on them.
I really don't want to shell out for this again. I know everyone can say it's your future etc etc, but the issue for me is that I'm not happy with myself for the result but it's not bad enough that I should clearly re-take it unless I only accept being an overachiever.
With a Q36 (that score puts you in the 35th percentile), you're probably looking at some really easy points in quant if you take the exam again. And a higher GMAT score should help, even if your school tells you that it encourages applications from candidates with a range of GMAT scores. That's a standard response that does what they need it do (encourage applications) without really getting into what an individual candidate's chances are (to be fair, that's not something that they could get into over email, even if they wanted to). Also, I don't normally come across people applying to only one program (it's riskier). If you don't mind, why
are you really focused on only one program?
About taking the GMAT again: maybe you could ask yourself whether you feel that putting a little more time (and money) into getting a score that is higher than the average score at your target school(s) is going to help you justify the (probably greater) amount of time (and money) involved in applying to your target school(s)?
Finally, what was your GMATPrep Q/V split?
Thanks for you advice. I found it very insightful and I'm most likely going to do it again very soon. You made it sound like I couldn't do worse which I sort of agree with. However, I doubt I'd do as well again on the verbal so my score will probably be better but not by that much because I'm sure my verbal score was an exception.
I contacted the school and they said they recommend a re-write if you're below 600 and their average GMAT entry is 625. I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better. The reason I'm only applying to one school is because I'd like to stay in the city I'm in and it's the only program I want to get into as it is one year, highly ranked and the tuition is very very reasonable. There's another program in the city that has a lower ranking and needs about a 560, for the same price and same length of time, that I'll probably apply to as a plan B. There's another program that is ranked slightly higher than my main choice but the tuition is literally over 25x more (still less than a US school).
For me the main thing is really the money and the time but I'll probably re-take it in a month so it's not a huge loss of time. For the money, part of it is the principle of these standardized tests, particularly since it's my first ever standardized test. It's not that I can't afford it, I just don't agree with it. I guess sometimes you have to just play ball. If you're talking about paying a few hundred thousand in tuition, 250 USD isn't that much but that type of tuition and even 250 USD for a test is absurd to me.
For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.
Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.
So thanks again for your advice. You made a very good point. Also the school only takes the highest score anyways. I don't want them to think that 620 is the best I could do. The other thing is that the quant is pretty easy to study for and is the part that you can definitely improve upon. I imagine it would be very hard to improve on the verbal and on all the tests, I finished with a lot of time to spare and didn't even study for that section so I'll spend very little time studying that and just focus on the quant.