Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 07:07 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 07:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,776
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,776
Kudos: 1,507
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WayneHam
I scored 36 on the Quant and 40 on the Verbal. I have a science background so the Quant score is sooo bad. I scored 670 on the free practice exam but everyone scores higher on them.

I really don't want to shell out for this again. I know everyone can say it's your future etc etc, but the issue for me is that I'm not happy with myself for the result but it's not bad enough that I should clearly re-take it unless I only accept being an overachiever.
With a Q36 (that score puts you in the 35th percentile), you're probably looking at some really easy points in quant if you take the exam again. And a higher GMAT score should help, even if your school tells you that it encourages applications from candidates with a range of GMAT scores. That's a standard response that does what they need it do (encourage applications) without really getting into what an individual candidate's chances are (to be fair, that's not something that they could get into over email, even if they wanted to). Also, I don't normally come across people applying to only one program (it's riskier). If you don't mind, why are you really focused on only one program?

About taking the GMAT again: maybe you could ask yourself whether you feel that putting a little more time (and money) into getting a score that is higher than the average score at your target school(s) is going to help you justify the (probably greater) amount of time (and money) involved in applying to your target school(s)?

Finally, what was your GMATPrep Q/V split?
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
WayneHam
I scored 36 on the Quant and 40 on the Verbal. I have a science background so the Quant score is sooo bad. I scored 670 on the free practice exam but everyone scores higher on them.

I really don't want to shell out for this again. I know everyone can say it's your future etc etc, but the issue for me is that I'm not happy with myself for the result but it's not bad enough that I should clearly re-take it unless I only accept being an overachiever.
With a Q36 (that score puts you in the 35th percentile), you're probably looking at some really easy points in quant if you take the exam again. And a higher GMAT score should help, even if your school tells you that it encourages applications from candidates with a range of GMAT scores. That's a standard response that does what they need it do (encourage applications) without really getting into what an individual candidate's chances are (to be fair, that's not something that they could get into over email, even if they wanted to). Also, I don't normally come across people applying to only one program (it's riskier). If you don't mind, why are you really focused on only one program?

About taking the GMAT again: maybe you could ask yourself whether you feel that putting a little more time (and money) into getting a score that is higher than the average score at your target school(s) is going to help you justify the (probably greater) amount of time (and money) involved in applying to your target school(s)?

Finally, what was your GMATPrep Q/V split?

Thanks for you advice. I found it very insightful and I'm most likely going to do it again very soon. You made it sound like I couldn't do worse which I sort of agree with. However, I doubt I'd do as well again on the verbal so my score will probably be better but not by that much because I'm sure my verbal score was an exception.

I contacted the school and they said they recommend a re-write if you're below 600 and their average GMAT entry is 625. I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better. The reason I'm only applying to one school is because I'd like to stay in the city I'm in and it's the only program I want to get into as it is one year, highly ranked and the tuition is very very reasonable. There's another program in the city that has a lower ranking and needs about a 560, for the same price and same length of time, that I'll probably apply to as a plan B. There's another program that is ranked slightly higher than my main choice but the tuition is literally over 25x more (still less than a US school).

For me the main thing is really the money and the time but I'll probably re-take it in a month so it's not a huge loss of time. For the money, part of it is the principle of these standardized tests, particularly since it's my first ever standardized test. It's not that I can't afford it, I just don't agree with it. I guess sometimes you have to just play ball. If you're talking about paying a few hundred thousand in tuition, 250 USD isn't that much but that type of tuition and even 250 USD for a test is absurd to me.

For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.

Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.

So thanks again for your advice. You made a very good point. Also the school only takes the highest score anyways. I don't want them to think that 620 is the best I could do. The other thing is that the quant is pretty easy to study for and is the part that you can definitely improve upon. I imagine it would be very hard to improve on the verbal and on all the tests, I finished with a lot of time to spare and didn't even study for that section so I'll spend very little time studying that and just focus on the quant.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WayneHam
I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better.

For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.

Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.
Thank you for the detailed response.

If you got Q42s on both your GMATPreps, you should be able to do better than a Q36. The GMAT is a statistical tool and there is measurement error involved, but I really think you got something that represents the lower end of what you can do. I definitely wouldn't want you to think that a Q36 is natural given 42s on the GMATPrep. Your verbal, on the other hand, has been remarkably consistent: 40, 38, and (on the actual test) 40. You're absolutely right that a V40 is an excellent score. Even more amazing considering that you had time left on your verbal section.

Coming back to your main question: maybe you should look at your GMAT score in the context of the overall application process. Your schools are not going to think that you have zero quantitative skills. But that's probably because you will include other evidence that you have what it takes to get through the quant they need. But there is a limited amount of information you can send them (in whatever form). A slightly higher score on the GMAT quant would allow both you and your school to just completely bypass that. You want to spend as little time as possible on having to go back and forth with them on something this basic. Less does the candidate meet our minimum expectations and more these are the ways this candidate stands out.
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
WayneHam
I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better.

For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.

Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.
Thank you for the detailed response.

If you got Q42s on both your GMATPreps, you should be able to do better than a Q36. The GMAT is a statistical tool and there is measurement error involved, but I really think you got something that represents the lower end of what you can do. I definitely wouldn't want you to think that a Q36 is natural given 42s on the GMATPrep. Your verbal, on the other hand, has been remarkably consistent: 40, 38, and (on the actual test) 40. You're absolutely right that a V40 is an excellent score. Even more amazing considering that you had time left on your verbal section.

Coming back to your main question: maybe you should look at your GMAT score in the context of the overall application process. Your schools are not going to think that you have zero quantitative skills. But that's probably because you will include other evidence that you have what it takes to get through the quant they need. But there is a limited amount of information you can send them (in whatever form). A slightly higher score on the GMAT quant would allow both you and your school to just completely bypass that. You want to spend as little time as possible on having to go back and forth with them on something this basic. Less does the candidate meet our minimum expectations and more these are the ways this candidate stands out.

After taking the weekend off I've decided to re-write it but to do so relatively soon, probably Nov. 2. I could write it as late as early December but I don't want this to eat up so much of my time. Also I'll just study the quant sections which should make it easier. In the end I can most likely do better so I'd rather be the student that they jump to accept rather than the student that they make an exception for. I still think I could get in since I think I'm a strong candidate but taking the risk isn't really necessary since I don't think 620 is my max. My current plan is to do all of the quant questions in my book and make an error log. Hopefully by then I know the types of questions and I'm ready to answer them quickly.
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I've rebooked the test for Nov. 7. Did all the PS and DS questions in the Official Guide over the last month and I'm feeling good since I put in a good amount of work and feel much more confident answering questions. Barring catastrophic failure, I'm confident I'll beat my 620 from Sept. 17th. I think my verbal will go down though since I haven't touched it. The next week I'll work on IR to avoid my dismal score last time and review verbal a bit.
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
WayneHam
I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better.

For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.

Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.
Thank you for the detailed response.

If you got Q42s on both your GMATPreps, you should be able to do better than a Q36. The GMAT is a statistical tool and there is measurement error involved, but I really think you got something that represents the lower end of what you can do. I definitely wouldn't want you to think that a Q36 is natural given 42s on the GMATPrep. Your verbal, on the other hand, has been remarkably consistent: 40, 38, and (on the actual test) 40. You're absolutely right that a V40 is an excellent score. Even more amazing considering that you had time left on your verbal section.

Coming back to your main question: maybe you should look at your GMAT score in the context of the overall application process. Your schools are not going to think that you have zero quantitative skills. But that's probably because you will include other evidence that you have what it takes to get through the quant they need. But there is a limited amount of information you can send them (in whatever form). A slightly higher score on the GMAT quant would allow both you and your school to just completely bypass that. You want to spend as little time as possible on having to go back and forth with them on something this basic. Less does the candidate meet our minimum expectations and more these are the ways this candidate stands out.

I just wanted to update that I scored a 710 on the GMAT today. Thanks for your input on this thread as it made some good points and convinced me to re-write despite the high price of the test and the amount of time spend on studying. Most of the responses to threads on here are of the copy-paste type so I appreciate having had your feedback.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WayneHam
I just wanted to update that I scored a 710 on the GMAT today. Thanks for your input on this thread as it made some good points and convinced me to re-write despite the high price of the test and the amount of time spend on studying. Most of the responses to threads on here are of the copy-paste type so I appreciate having had your feedback.
No problem. 710 is a great score, and the 90 point jump is just amazing.

All the best for the applications process!
User avatar
farrous13
Joined: 01 Apr 2015
Last visit: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 117
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Location: Canada
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
GPA: 3.23
WE:Project Management (Energy)
Posts: 117
Kudos: 99
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WayneHam
AjiteshArun
WayneHam
I asked if they look at the scores separately and they said they do and they like to have a high mark in both components. So that part does make me think about re-writing it in case they think I have zero quantitative skills. So basically I think it'd be hard to do worse considering the quant score, as you said. Also I don't want them to think that I can't do any better.

For my GMAT prep I scored a 670 on the first try and 660 on the second try. So 620 sounds about right from what I read here with the prep tests, however my 670 I scored a 42 quant and 40 verbal and for the second I had a 42 quant and 38 verbal vs. 36 quant and 40 verbal on the real test. The second test I probably should have scored higher considering a lot of the questions were the same but I studied like 4 hours before that so I learned that I need to be fresh like the first prep test. Also I only studied by myself with the official guide for like 4 weekends and sparingly the month before that so I could definitely do better with more studying.

Based on those scores do you still think I should easily improve or is the 620 about right based on the test scores and their split? Keep in mind I'm not like the people on here that have taken 5 real tests and 25 practice tests.
Thank you for the detailed response.

If you got Q42s on both your GMATPreps, you should be able to do better than a Q36. The GMAT is a statistical tool and there is measurement error involved, but I really think you got something that represents the lower end of what you can do. I definitely wouldn't want you to think that a Q36 is natural given 42s on the GMATPrep. Your verbal, on the other hand, has been remarkably consistent: 40, 38, and (on the actual test) 40. You're absolutely right that a V40 is an excellent score. Even more amazing considering that you had time left on your verbal section.

Coming back to your main question: maybe you should look at your GMAT score in the context of the overall application process. Your schools are not going to think that you have zero quantitative skills. But that's probably because you will include other evidence that you have what it takes to get through the quant they need. But there is a limited amount of information you can send them (in whatever form). A slightly higher score on the GMAT quant would allow both you and your school to just completely bypass that. You want to spend as little time as possible on having to go back and forth with them on something this basic. Less does the candidate meet our minimum expectations and more these are the ways this candidate stands out.

I just wanted to update that I scored a 710 on the GMAT today. Thanks for your input on this thread as it made some good points and convinced me to re-write despite the high price of the test and the amount of time spend on studying. Most of the responses to threads on here are of the copy-paste type so I appreciate having had your feedback.


WayneHam, good job on getting that score. How did you study during the day and for how long? I believe your main focus was on the Quant section.

Overall. it's a fantastic jump in just a short period of time.
avatar
WayneHam
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Last visit: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V40
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 710 Q47 V41
Posts: 106
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As most of us are working full time, I was mainly only able to study on the weekends, I studied between 6 and 13 hours per week. Less than 5 of those hours were from mon to Fri. I studied the quant exclusively using only the og questions. Then I redid gmat prep 1 before. I made another thread on that test with some tips.
Moderator:
Founder
43161 posts