Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
100%
(01:31)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 13
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Walking a mile at a slow pace, from 1.8 to 2.5 mph, burns about 100 calories. Walking a mile at a brisk pace, from 3 to 4 mph, also burns about 100 calories, though in a shorter amount of time. Jogging a mile, from 4.5 to 6 mph, burns about the same 100 calories. The difference in covering a mile at faster speeds is not in the number of calories burned, but in the greater degree of cardio-vascular benefit.
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the statements above?
A)Jogging builds more muscle tone than does walking at a slow pace.
B)Speed is directly proportional to the number of calories burned.
C)Walking at a brisk pace for a shorter amount of time burns more calories than does walking at a slow pace for a longer amount of time.
D)There are benefits to walking at a slow pace other than burning calories.
E)Jogging a mile offers greater cardiovascular benefit than does walking a mile briskly or at a slow pace.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Walking a mile at a slow pace, from 1.8 to 2.5 mph, burns about 100 calories. Walking a mile at a brisk pace, from 3 to 4 mph, also burns about 100 calories, though in a shorter amount of time. Jogging a mile, from 4.5 to 6 mph, burns about the same 100 calories. The difference in covering a mile at faster speeds is not in the number of calories burned, but in the greater degree of cardio-vascular benefit.
Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the statements above?
A)Jogging builds more muscle tone than does walking at a slow pace.
B)Speed is directly proportional to the number of calories burned.
C)Walking at a brisk pace for a shorter amount of time burns more calories than does walking at a slow pace for a longer amount of time.
D)There are benefits to walking at a slow pace other than burning calories.
E)Jogging a mile offers greater cardiovascular benefit than does walking a mile briskly or at a slow pace.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.