GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 24 Apr 2018, 00:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 243
GMAT ToolKit User
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2012, 04:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:21) correct 47% (01:48) wrong based on 372 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts
Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: Booth '15 (M)
WE: Business Development (Non-Profit and Government)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2012, 17:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
MBAhereIcome wrote:
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.


Thoughts on the prompt:
It says that language reveals how its speakers lived. Then a conclusion is drawn based on the presence of three words and the absence of a word for "sea."

Thoughts on the answer choices:
A: Fish can come from lakes and rivers. If you fail to consider this, you might think this choice weakens the argument. It's a trap!
B: This is noteworthy. This could mean speakers of Proto-Indo-European actually did live near a sea. Good answer choice.
C: This is irrelevant.
D: This is irrelevant.
E: This is irrelevant.

I would choose answer choice B.

Side note: Languages vary in the number of names they have for colors. The minimum number of terms for any known language is two (light and dark). But this doesn't mean that speakers of that language don't see colors the way English speakers do. There's a lot of interesting stuff about color-naming on Wikipedia.

Edit: Edited to add side note.

_________________

My GMAT debrief

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Juggg..Jugggg Go!
Joined: 11 May 2012
Posts: 227
Location: India
GC Meter: A.W.E.S.O.M.E
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Reviews Badge
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2012, 20:51
good question :)
_________________

You haven't failed, if you haven't given up!
---
bschooladmit
Visit my Blog www.bschooladmit.wordpress.com

Check out my other posts:
Bschool Deadlines 2013-2014 | Bschool Admission Events 2013 Start your GMAT Prep with Stacey Koprince | Get a head start in MBA finance

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 505
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2012, 03:33
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
Fish can be from river/lake, sea is not necessarily involved.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
Strong paraphrasing, weakens the argument by giving additional idea.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
Other languages are not in the scope.
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
Doesn't mean that they should have a word for sea as well.
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.
Then they must have the word.
(B) Wins
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 402
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2013, 15:38
thevenus wrote:
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
Fish can be from river/lake, sea is not necessarily involved.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
Strong paraphrasing, weakens the argument by giving additional idea.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
Other languages are not in the scope.
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
Doesn't mean that they should have a word for sea as well.
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.
Then they must have the word.
(B) Wins
Taking from above explanation, in E, if Proto-Indo-European guys were nomadic, they should have got this word by visiting any of sea or oceans while their nomadic adventures. Shouldn't this choice also weaken the argument?
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 315
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2013, 08:50
Hi - In questions like this, you have to be very careful as to what they mean by argument.

In this question the argument is the lack of the word for sea, being evidence for their living conditions.

SO the fact they are nomadic or not has nothing to do with that. You need a counter argument for using linguisitics to prove living conditions.

That is provided in the OA

James
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 342
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2013, 02:00
ONLY B comes closer to the answer....
E cannot be right as if the people were nomadic.... why did they have different words for cold places, snow, winter etc and none for sea ? It would mean they never came close to sea..... and wandered all near snow bound areas...
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 35
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 13:52
MBAhereIcome wrote:
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.


The author assumes that the words winter," "snow," and "wolf" are elements that present the culture. So, our task here is to undermine this assumptions. So choice "B" does that.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 40
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.29
Reviews Badge
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2017, 05:03
While it's easy to get to the answer. It sort of goes against GMAT rule - "what some people do or say rarely matters".

I have rarely seen an argument starting with "some" in the correct answer.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1927
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2017, 22:18
this is a LSAT question, and ones can see how a LSAT question is much different from a gmat question. I believe this question is not much useful for gmat test takers to practice.

The first time I read B, I have a feeling that B is the answer. Nevertheless, using the logic, it is hard to find out why B is correct. The pattern in B is that B gives an alternative cause, but B does not connect directly with the argument. Meanwhile, A,C,D can be safely ruled out.
I think the reason E is incorrect b/c E needs many more assumptions to e a correct answer.
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished   [#permalink] 09 Dec 2017, 22:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.