GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 12:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 207
GMAT ToolKit User
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2012, 03:59
2
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:44) correct 46% (01:51) wrong based on 390 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.

_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts
Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 123
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: Booth '15 (M)
WE: Business Development (Non-Profit and Government)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2012, 16:15
1
MBAhereIcome wrote:
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.


Thoughts on the prompt:
It says that language reveals how its speakers lived. Then a conclusion is drawn based on the presence of three words and the absence of a word for "sea."

Thoughts on the answer choices:
A: Fish can come from lakes and rivers. If you fail to consider this, you might think this choice weakens the argument. It's a trap!
B: This is noteworthy. This could mean speakers of Proto-Indo-European actually did live near a sea. Good answer choice.
C: This is irrelevant.
D: This is irrelevant.
E: This is irrelevant.

I would choose answer choice B.

Side note: Languages vary in the number of names they have for colors. The minimum number of terms for any known language is two (light and dark). But this doesn't mean that speakers of that language don't see colors the way English speakers do. There's a lot of interesting stuff about color-naming on Wikipedia.

Edit: Edited to add side note.

_________________

My GMAT debrief

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 448
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2012, 02:33
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
Fish can be from river/lake, sea is not necessarily involved.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
Strong paraphrasing, weakens the argument by giving additional idea.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
Other languages are not in the scope.
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
Doesn't mean that they should have a word for sea as well.
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.
Then they must have the word.
(B) Wins
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 356
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2013, 14:38
thevenus wrote:
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
Fish can be from river/lake, sea is not necessarily involved.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
Strong paraphrasing, weakens the argument by giving additional idea.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
Other languages are not in the scope.
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
Doesn't mean that they should have a word for sea as well.
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.
Then they must have the word.
(B) Wins
Taking from above explanation, in E, if Proto-Indo-European guys were nomadic, they should have got this word by visiting any of sea or oceans while their nomadic adventures. Shouldn't this choice also weaken the argument?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 275
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2013, 07:50
Hi - In questions like this, you have to be very careful as to what they mean by argument.

In this question the argument is the lack of the word for sea, being evidence for their living conditions.

SO the fact they are nomadic or not has nothing to do with that. You need a counter argument for using linguisitics to prove living conditions.

That is provided in the OA

James
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 291
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2013, 01:00
ONLY B comes closer to the answer....
E cannot be right as if the people were nomadic.... why did they have different words for cold places, snow, winter etc and none for sea ? It would mean they never came close to sea..... and wandered all near snow bound areas...
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Posts: 34
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2017, 12:52
MBAhereIcome wrote:
We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished culture by examining its language. Thus, it is likely that the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European, the language from which all Indo-European languages descended, lived in a cold climate, isolated from ocean or sea, because Proto-Indo-European lacks a word for "sea," yet contains words for "winter," "snow," and "wolf."

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) A word meaning "fish" was used by the people who spoke Proto-Indo-European.
(B) Some languages lack words for prominent elements of the environments of their speakers.
(C) There are no known languages today that lack a word for "sea."
(D) Proto-Indo-European possesses words for "heat."
(E) The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were nomadic.


The author assumes that the words winter," "snow," and "wolf" are elements that present the culture. So, our task here is to undermine this assumptions. So choice "B" does that.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 37
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.29
Reviews Badge
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2017, 04:03
While it's easy to get to the answer. It sort of goes against GMAT rule - "what some people do or say rarely matters".

I have rarely seen an argument starting with "some" in the correct answer.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1645
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2017, 21:18
this is a LSAT question, and ones can see how a LSAT question is much different from a gmat question. I believe this question is not much useful for gmat test takers to practice.

The first time I read B, I have a feeling that B is the answer. Nevertheless, using the logic, it is hard to find out why B is correct. The pattern in B is that B gives an alternative cause, but B does not connect directly with the argument. Meanwhile, A,C,D can be safely ruled out.
I think the reason E is incorrect b/c E needs many more assumptions to e a correct answer.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished &nbs [#permalink] 09 Dec 2017, 21:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

We can learn about the living conditions of a vanished

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.