It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 09:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

Author Message
VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 06:37
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 15:38
1
KUDOS
A

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [1], given: 2

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 19:16
1
KUDOS
concur with A. Author is saying that initially, critics will argue about a work , but after a long time, they agree on calling it great. He cites the examples of Bach et all, so it must mean that back in the day, critics must have disagreed about those individuals work.

Kudos [?]: 185 [1], given: 2

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 21:50
pmenon wrote:
concur with A. Author is saying that initially, critics will argue about a work , but after a long time, they agree on calling it great. He cites the examples of Bach et all, so it must mean that back in the day, critics must have disagreed about those individuals work.

oa b

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 07:11
ill go for A...why B...someone explain plz...

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 114 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 17:03
1
KUDOS
marcodonzelli wrote:
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

When I first read this, I thought it was A. But after seeing the OA and re-reading it, I think I can see why it is B. It is said that, 'in the short term...the value of a particular contemporary work of art....the subjective element disappears' --> therefore, the contemporary art = subjective element.
'when works of art continue to delight audiences...we can [finally] objectively call them great'
works of art that continue to delight audiences != contemporary art anymore
Therefore, value of contemporary are can not be objectively measured since they are not works of art that continue to delight audiences.

I was REALLY pushing it to make B make sense... on test day, I defintely, would have chosen A.

Kudos [?]: 114 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 0

Schools: Ross, Kellogg, Darden (i/v)
Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 21:51
1
KUDOS
It still doesn't make sense to me!

Kudos [?]: 10 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 04:14
mba07 wrote:
It still doesn't make sense to me!

nor to me

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2008, 06:10
1
KUDOS
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Let me put it like this...the question asked is: The statements above best support "which of the following (as a )conclusion"?

Now we know either A or B is the answer: let us put "therefore"(concluding word--- any other concluding word also wuld do) to the two statements and see:

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.Therefore..When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work...???

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.Therefore..The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.

Option B provides with a sentence which can be appropriately be derieved as a conclusion for the evidence stated..but A doesnt...

So according to me B is the OA and makes more reasonable..

Kudos [?]: 4 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 3   [#permalink] 01 Feb 2008, 06:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.