Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Whats the trick on finding factor pairs larger than 12? Is there one?
For instance, 1) factors into (x-3) and (x+16) .. should I just memorize my multiplication tables to 16? That seems a little strange to me because thats a lot of work, not that im agianst that, and where do I stop? Is there a better way?
Also, 2) factors into \(3(x^2 - 3x -28)\). Which I would just divide 84 by 3 to get 28....via long division if i dont immediately recognize it......is that the proper/fastest technique?
So I guess what Im asking here is whats the thought process I should have when approaching factor pairs larger than 12.
Sorry, I dont know what level this is at. First post, evaah!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
You don't need to remember any of the tables, but if you do you could speed yourself up to calculations wherever they may be required. For the problems above you could break down the multiplication into prime factors and then combine to arrive at the exact pair. e.g 48 can be written as 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3. now combine pairs to get the total summation to whatever is required in this case 13. therefore the combination would be 2*2*2*2 and 3 i.e 16 and 3
Same logic should work for the second problem as well.
Edit: WHAT?! Why didnt anyone tell me about this sooner.....Im in a moral dilemma now. Part of me wants to share this with my friends but the other part of me wants to use this as a parlor trick for free beer.
Whats the trick on finding factor pairs larger than 12? Is there one?
For instance, 1) factors into (x-3) and (x+16) .. should I just memorize my multiplication tables to 16? That seems a little strange to me because thats a lot of work, not that im agianst that, and where do I stop? Is there a better way?
Also, 2) factors into \(3(x^2 - 3x -28)\). Which I would just divide 84 by 3 to get 28....via long division if i dont immediately recognize it......is that the proper/fastest technique?
So I guess what Im asking here is whats the thought process I should have when approaching factor pairs larger than 12.
Sorry, I dont know what level this is at. First post, evaah!
Show more
Here's how I'd recommend approaching the first one: you're not just looking for any pair of numbers that multiply to make -48, you also need them to sum to 13. One of the two numbers will definitely have to be negative, or else their product couldn't be -48. So, the other number will have to be bigger than 13. Start checking methodically, either in your head or on paper:
14+(-1) = 13, but 14*-1 definitely doesn't equal -48 15 + (-2) = 13, but 15*-2 = -30... getting closer. 16 + (-3) = 13, and 16*-3 = -48. One clue that this is going to be the right pair is that the units digit will be the same as the units digit of 6*3, which is 8.
That is - you don't need to look at every pair of factors of 48 - you only need to find the pair of factors that also sums to 13. So in a lot of cases, it's actually easier to start with the 13.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.