Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 08 Jul 2015, 08:01
2
37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
75% (hard)
Question Stats:
53% (01:22) correct 47% (01:32) wrong based on 654 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the dashed lines, and taped along the solid lines, the result is a model of a geometric solid. This geometric solid consists of 2 pyramids each with a square base that they share. What is the sum of number of edges and number of faces of this geometric solid?
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Jul 2015, 11:02
vikasbansal227 wrote:
When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the dashed lines, and taped along the solid lines, the result is a model of a geometric solid. This geometric solid consists of 2 pyramids each with a square base that they share. What is the sum of number of edges and number of faces of this geometric solid?
A. 10 B. 18 C. 20 D. 24 E. 25
Dear vikasbansal227 I'm happy to respond. This is a great question.
First of all, here is a labeled version of the polyhedral net you provided:
Attachment:
octahedron net.JPG [ 21.01 KiB | Viewed 12125 times ]
Incidentally, in your version, you indicate a solid line from B to I, but this should be a dashed line.
When this is folded up, the name of the resultant shape is the Octahedron, one of the five Platonic Solids. It good practice for 3D thinking to study the five Platonic Solids. But, suppose you didn't know about the Octahedron: how would we answer the question?
Notice, that when we fold up, A & C come together, so we could say that B is the vertex of one pyramid, with four edges going down to D, I, J, and A/C. These latter four points form a square that is the "equator" of the shape, so there are four edges around this square. Then, we fold F & H together, forming the second pyramid. This second pyramid has G as its vertex, with four edges come down to the points E, D, I, and F/H; these latter four points also form a square. Then, segment DI acts as a hinge, and along this hinge we fold one pyramid down to meet the other, so that the square bases of the two pyramids meet and become one. Point A/C joins with point E, and point J joins with point F/H. The final shape has a lower downward-pointing pyramid, with point B as the lower vertex. Four edges go up from this vertex to the square "equator." This square "equator" consists of points D + I + A/C/E + F/H/J, and like any square, it contains four edge segments. Finally, the upper upward-pointing pyramid has vertex G, and four edges go from this vertex down to the four vertices of the square "equator." That's a total of 12 edges.
We can simply count the 8 faces while it is still flat.
E + F = 12 + 8 = 20 ==> OA = (C)
The thing that is a little mind-blowing about the octahedron is this. In the above description, I was discussing the "upper vertex," the "lower vertex," and the "square equator," but because the shape is 100% symmetrical, if we simply turn the shape, any vertex can be the tip of the upper pyramid. There are actually three interlocking squares formed by different combinations of the vertices. This Wikipedia page has a gif of a rotating octahedron, which may help you visualize it more.
Does all this make sense? Mike _________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jul 2015, 14:38
[quote="mikemcgarry"][quote="vikasbansal227"] "Incidentally, in your version, you indicate a solid line from B to I, but this should be a dashed line." Thanks for you post Mike. Just as a reference though, In the OG2015, there is a solid line from B to I
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jul 2015, 10:22
mikemcgarry wrote:
vikasbansal227 wrote:
When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the dashed lines, and taped along the solid lines, the result is a model of a geometric solid. This geometric solid consists of 2 pyramids each with a square base that they share. What is the sum of number of edges and number of faces of this geometric solid?
A. 10 B. 18 C. 20 D. 24 E. 25
Dear vikasbansal227 I'm happy to respond. This is a great question.
First of all, here is a labeled version of the polyhedral net you provided:
Attachment:
octahedron net.JPG
Incidentally, in your version, you indicate a solid line from B to I, but this should be a dashed line.
When this is folded up, the name of the resultant shape is the Octahedron, one of the five Platonic Solids. It good practice for 3D thinking to study the five Platonic Solids. But, suppose you didn't know about the Octahedron: how would we answer the question?
Notice, that when we fold up, A & C come together, so we could say that B is the vertex of one pyramid, with four edges going down to D, I, J, and A/C. These latter four points form a square that is the "equator" of the shape, so there are four edges around this square. Then, we fold F & H together, forming the second pyramid. This second pyramid has G as its vertex, with four edges come down to the points E, D, I, and F/H; these latter four points also form a square. Then, segment DI acts as a hinge, and along this hinge we fold one pyramid down to meet the other, so that the square bases of the two pyramids meet and become one. Point A/C joins with point E, and point J joins with point F/H. The final shape has a lower downward-pointing pyramid, with point B as the lower vertex. Four edges go up from this vertex to the square "equator." This square "equator" consists of points D + I + A/C/E + F/H/J, and like any square, it contains four edge segments. Finally, the upper upward-pointing pyramid has vertex G, and four edges go from this vertex down to the four vertices of the square "equator." That's a total of 12 edges.
We can simply count the 8 faces while it is still flat.
E + F = 12 + 8 = 20 ==> OA = (C)
The thing that is a little mind-blowing about the octahedron is this. In the above description, I was discussing the "upper vertex," the "lower vertex," and the "square equator," but because the shape is 100% symmetrical, if we simply turn the shape, any vertex can be the tip of the upper pyramid. There are actually three interlocking squares formed by different combinations of the vertices. This Wikipedia page has a gif of a rotating octahedron, which may help you visualize it more.
Does all this make sense? Mike
Hello Mike, I went through wikipedia link you have mentioned and got to know the shape of octahedron But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2015, 13:54
1
divya517 wrote:
Hello Mike, I went through wikipedia link you have mentioned and got to know the shape of octahedron But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
Dear divya517, My friend, this is a HARD question. If the student has run across the octahedron ahead of time, then that probably would give an advantage on this question. The octahedron is a very hard shape to understand, and getting it just from the diagram and the brief verbal description is extremely challenging. If you find 3D Geometry particularly challenging, it might be worthwhile to investigate this a little further to stretch yourself. The octahedron is one of a set of 3D figures known as the "Platonic Solids." The cube is another, and there are five altogether. Investigate these, as well as prisms and pyramids in general. Learning to think in 3D about abstract geometry is a skill that deepen other categories of mathematical thinking. Does all this make sense? Mike _________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2015, 12:47
2
mikemcgarry wrote:
divya517 wrote:
Hello Mike, I went through wikipedia link you have mentioned and got to know the shape of octahedron But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
Dear divya517, My friend, this is a HARD question. If the student has run across the octahedron ahead of time, then that probably would give an advantage on this question. The octahedron is a very hard shape to understand, and getting it just from the diagram and the brief verbal description is extremely challenging. If you find 3D Geometry particularly challenging, it might be worthwhile to investigate this a little further to stretch yourself. The octahedron is one of a set of 3D figures known as the "Platonic Solids." The cube is another, and there are five altogether. Investigate these, as well as prisms and pyramids in general. Learning to think in 3D about abstract geometry is a skill that deepen other categories of mathematical thinking. Does all this make sense? Mike
Hey Mike, I have a general question for problems like this. If I see a figure like this and it's extremely complex to visualize or understand the folds, will the question stem usually tell you the end shape after all the folding? I'm no GMAT expert by any means, but I solved this in under a minute because I basically looked at the figure and thought "to heck with that, can't understand what it's telling me", so I kept reading and the question actually tells me what the final shape is: Two pyramids that share the square face. There's only one way for two pyramids to share the same square face. Everything else was easy, didn't use the figure at all. So again my question to you is, will my method work for other problems similar to this? I want to generalize this so that I can put this in my "pattern recognition" notebook.
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2015, 23:15
21
5
divya517 wrote:
But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
You can ignore the diagram completely (as I did when I solved it) because the question tells you that you get a figure with "2 pyramids each with a square base that they share". Imagine what one pyramid looks like - a square with triangles attached to each side and the tips of the triangles stuck together. Imagine how would you have two pyramids with a common base. There would be 4 triangles on the lower side of the square too and their tips would be stuck together. So in all, the figure would have 8 faces (4 triangles + 4 triangles) and 12 edges ( 4 edges where the top triangles join, 4 edges where the bottom triangles join and 4 edges of the square). All in all you will have 8 + 12 = 20 faces + edges
_________________
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Sep 2015, 17:01
2
DarthestVader wrote:
Hey Mike, I have a general question for problems like this. If I see a figure like this and it's extremely complex to visualize or understand the folds, will the question stem usually tell you the end shape after all the folding? I'm no GMAT expert by any means, but I solved this in under a minute because I basically looked at the figure and thought "to heck with that, can't understand what it's telling me", so I kept reading and the question actually tells me what the final shape is: Two pyramids that share the square face. There's only one way for two pyramids to share the same square face. Everything else was easy, didn't use the figure at all. So again my question to you is, will my method work for other problems similar to this? I want to generalize this so that I can put this in my "pattern recognition" notebook.
Dear DarthestVader, I'm happy to respond. May the Force be with you, my friend.
You know, someone could sit for 100 days in a row, taking a GMAT each day, and might well never see a question anything like this. This is an exceedingly rare topic. This entire discussion concerns something that might about as likely as seeing a unicorn crossing a rainbow!
As a general rule, even hard GMAT math questions are designed to be solved with a certain amount of elegance, and certainly thinking about the figure in this problem just as the two pyramids joined at the bases is a kind of elegant solution, so in the exceedingly rare case that such a question reappeared, I would consider it likely that the text would include some kind of description of the final shape. That way, most folks who have the intelligence to excel in B-school and in the business world could answer the question.
Remember that even with a hard question, the GMAT is trying to discriminate between high scoring students and low scoring students, those for whom B-school will be easy vs. those for whom it will be a challenge. If the test writers just gave the polygonal net with no description of the output shape, then really only folks who had a very strong background in math would get it correct, and 99% of the test-takers would get it wrong. That's not the kind of discrimination that the test is trying to do, separating math geniuses from everyone else. From the perspective of the psychodynamics of testing, such a question would be an abysmal failure, because it simply doesn't select for what the test maker really wants to know.
Remember that the test writers have definite and specific goals in creating this test. The Quant section is a section to select those who will excel in B-school and in the business world. It is not designed to evaluate people pursing doctoral work in Mathematics. Part of being successful on the GMAT is appreciating the test makers' priorities.
Does all this make sense? Mike _________________
Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2016, 09:32
3
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
divya517 wrote:
But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
You can ignore the diagram completely (as I did when I solved it) because the question tells you that you get a figure with "2 pyramids each with a square base that they share". Imagine what one pyramid looks like - a square with triangles attached to each side and the tips of the triangles stuck together. Imagine how would you have two pyramids with a common base. There would be 4 triangles on the lower side of the square too and their tips would be stuck together. So in all, the figure would have 8 faces (4 triangles + 4 triangles) and 12 edges ( 4 edges where the top triangles join, 4 edges where the bottom triangles join and 4 edges of the square). All in all you will have 8 + 12 = 20 faces + edges
Responding to a pm:
Quote:
What the faces of the square base? (+2)?
The two pyramids share the square. So the square is hidden inside them. Look at this figure.
Attachment:
platonic027.gif [ 4.56 KiB | Viewed 8282 times ]
The colourful figure inside shows two pyramids joined together.
_________________
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2017, 00:44
3
1
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
The two pyramids share the square. So the square is hidden inside them. Look at this figure.
Attachment:
The attachment platonic027.gif is no longer available
The colourful figure inside shows two pyramids joined together.
Quote:
"So in all, the figure would have 8 faces (4 triangles + 4 triangles) and 12 edges ( 4 edges where the top triangles join, 4 edges where the bottom triangles join and 4 edges of the square). " I'm able to understand 8 faces part. But unable to get 12 edges [4edges of top triangle + 4edges of bottom triangle + 4 edges of the square]. When you consider 4 edges of the top triangle that forms the tip of the pyramid, why should it be considered as 4 separate edges. If so all 3 edges of the triangles should also be considered separately, making 12 edges for top triangle and 12 edges for bottom triangle + 4 edges of the square.
When 4 triangles are joined together to make the top figure, we get 4 edges.
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2017, 06:45
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
divya517 wrote:
But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
You can ignore the diagram completely (as I did when I solved it) because the question tells you that you get a figure with "2 pyramids each with a square base that they share". Imagine what one pyramid looks like - a square with triangles attached to each side and the tips of the triangles stuck together. Imagine how would you have two pyramids with a common base. There would be 4 triangles on the lower side of the square too and their tips would be stuck together. So in all, the figure would have 8 faces (4 triangles + 4 triangles) and 12 edges ( 4 edges where the top triangles join, 4 edges where the bottom triangles join and 4 edges of the square). All in all you will have 8 + 12 = 20 faces + edges
Thank you very much Karishma..This is easier solution and time saving Approach.
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2017, 08:15
1
Does anyone else only count 6 edges? I know 14 is not an answer choice, but counting 12 edges seems to double count in my mind? Like the base of the two pyramids there are 4 edges that both pyramids share, then each of the pyramids has a top edge? Why do we count the base edges twice?
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2017, 22:47
brandon7 wrote:
Does anyone else only count 6 edges? I know 14 is not an answer choice, but counting 12 edges seems to double count in my mind? Like the base of the two pyramids there are 4 edges that both pyramids share, then each of the pyramids has a top edge? Why do we count the base edges twice?
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Aug 2017, 17:27
1
brandon7 wrote:
Does anyone else only count 6 edges? I know 14 is not an answer choice, but counting 12 edges seems to double count in my mind? Like the base of the two pyramids there are 4 edges that both pyramids share, then each of the pyramids has a top edge? Why do we count the base edges twice?
You are confusing 'edges' with 'vertices'.
Face: is the flat surface of a solid figure. A face of a solid figure can be a square, a rectangle, a triangle or a circle. Edge: is the line segment two faces of a solid meet. Corner (vertex): is a corner where three or more edges of a solid meet.
Re: When the figure above is cut along the solid lines, folded along the [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2017, 07:11
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
divya517 wrote:
But i could not interpret the shape from original diagram given in the question
You can ignore the diagram completely (as I did when I solved it) because the question tells you that you get a figure with "2 pyramids each with a square base that they share". Imagine what one pyramid looks like - a square with triangles attached to each side and the tips of the triangles stuck together. Imagine how would you have two pyramids with a common base. There would be 4 triangles on the lower side of the square too and their tips would be stuck together. So in all, the figure would have 8 faces (4 triangles + 4 triangles) and 12 edges ( 4 edges where the top triangles join, 4 edges where the bottom triangles join and 4 edges of the square). All in all you will have 8 + 12 = 20 faces + edges
I'm still trying to understand the bolded part. Isn't it just one edge where the four triangle faces join? They join at one spot after all.
close
53% (01:22) correct 
This is a great question. 
