Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 21:37 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 21:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatbull
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Last visit: 04 Feb 2018
Posts: 332
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Posts: 332
Kudos: 2,745
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lagomez
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Last visit: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pranrasvij
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Last visit: 30 May 2013
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 131
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatbull
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Last visit: 04 Feb 2018
Posts: 332
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Posts: 332
Kudos: 2,745
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, agreed; C-E are out, for same reason mentioned by Pransasvij.

My contention centers on choices A & B. I'll now try to explain the basis
of elimination (or choice) of either of them.
A: only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
(i) passive -less preferred (if it -kangaroo- COULD BE PROVED...)

Is my second reasoning correct:
(ii) underlined part not correctly connecting to the non-underlined part; thus,
making a wrong comparison:
"a distinctly different species from other kangaroos" should be:
"a distinctly different species from that of other kangaroos"

B: "only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct"
(i) preferred- active (if it -kangaroo- IS PROVED...)
User avatar
BalakumaranP
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Location: Bangalore
Concentration: General
Schools: ISB '15
Posts: 12
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I see it like this..

A. only if it could be proved to be a distinctly different species
There is already a condition for proof "only if" present in the sentence so "could be " is redundant.

B. only if it is proved to be a different species, distinct
Redundancy is eliminated here..
User avatar
dkverma
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Last visit: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 98
Kudos: 715
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B.

Also 'could' can't be used with if.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
495 posts
358 posts