ramuramu1838 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
GopalChandak wrote:
It seems like we are talking about "one of the communities" in great lakes and hence it should take a singular verb. Not sure why communities are being considered as the subject?
This is admittedly a little bit confusing, but in this context, Cleveland isn't the ONLY community looking to its waterfront to improve the quality of urban life and attract. Rather, it is one of A LARGE NUMBER of communities, all of which ARE looking to
their waterfronts to improve the quality of urban life and attract new businesses.
Because we are talking about a large number of communities, a plural verb is needed.
But how would we know whether is it talking about only one community or all community, both are making sense
Meaning!
First, consider the "that are" scenario we have in (C):
Quote:
Cleveland is but one of a large number of communities on the Great Lakes that are looking to their waterfronts to improve the quality of urban life.
The meaning here is that a large number of communities are looking to improve the quality of urban life and Cleveland is one of these communities. In other words, Cleveland is a member of a group, and all the members of this group are behaving a certain way. Makes sense.
Now consider the "that is" scenario we have in (B):
Quote:
Cleveland is but one of a large number of communities on the Great Lakes that is looking at its waterfront to improve the quality of urban life.
This time, it seems that Cleveland
alone is looking to improve the quality of urban life. That may well be the case. But then, what is the modifier "of a large number of communities" doing there? If we're not being told that Cleveland is a member of a group whose members are all doing something, why mention the group at all? Are we supposed to assume the other communities aren't looking to improve the quality of urban life? At best, this is confusing. At worst it's nonsensical.
Because the "that are" interpretation is more logical, we can eliminate every option containing "that is."
The takeaway: there is no touch rule! You can't simply assume "that" always describes whatever noun it's closest to. You have to use context and ask yourself which interpretation makes more sense.
I hope that helps!