With privacy concerns, such as private entities accessing, using and possibly misusing biometric data plaguing the ever connected digitalized world,
the makers of privacy law seems to be in a dilemma as they often have no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data, like political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, also, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see.
A. the makers of privacy law seems to be in a dilemma as they often have no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data, like political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, also, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see.
B. lawmakers seem to be in a dilemma as it often has no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data, such as political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, also, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see.
C. over political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, and, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see, the makers of privacy law are in a dilemma as they often have no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data.
D. over political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, also, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see, the makers of privacy law are in a dilemma as they often have no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data.
E. lawmakers are in a dilemma as they often have no existing framework to define the scope of sensitive personal data, such as political and religious views, ethnicity and biometric data, and, what should be available in the public domain for one and all to see.