sid0791 wrote:
VeritasKarishma wrote:
aniket16c wrote:
Dear Experts,
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo
MikeScarn mikemcgarryI would appreciate your help in clearing some doubts:
1. In option B, as per my understanding which refers to "versatile style". If that is true how can " a style" employ difference aspects of genres. Nonetheless use of "which" does create a confusion.
2. If above factor is taken into consideration then, isn't option C pretty clear from meaning perspective? In such a case, the use of "yet" can be overlooked.
Thank you.
A style can be influenced by different aspects of genres. No issues there.
Option (C) says that he is considered the best cellist of the classical world. All other options just say that he is the best cellist. Do we intend to say that he is the best of the classical world? Not sure considering he employed aspects of modern minimalism too. Also, "yet" is a problem. Hence, I wouldn't go with (C).
VeritasKarishmaHi,
I agree that style can be influenced by different aspects of genres.
But in B, doesn't it sound like style IS influencing different aspects of genes. According to B "versatile style, which at the same time employs..."
How a style can employs?*
It can be influenced by something but it cannot do something itself.
Although there are errors in other options as well, but B also doesn't seem right, if we go by the meaning approach.
Please help in this
The highlighted is not correct. The style is using aspects of different genres, not influencing the genres.
"style, which employs aspects of different genres" means that he played in a versatile style, a style that used some aspects of different genres.
Note that versatile means variable/changeable. So he played in a versatile style and used aspects from different genres.
A style can be influenced by different genres. We can say that the style uses/employs aspects of different genres.
So (B) is correct.