The set S of numbers has the following properties

Splendid...+1! Dint look at it that way. Thanks for the explanation.
OA Please! (Not that I doubt it is D)

OA is D

But my point is (in stmt 2), if 1 is in set then according to (i) we have 1/1 in set, that mean another 1 . so x=1 and y =1
Now acc. to (ii) we have 1+1 =2 (x + y = z) in set
Now, can we again take the value of x or y as 2
How can x+y = x or y when neither x nor y is 0

Can we assume having more than one value of x or y?
or does it mean x and y are any two values in set? But question dosent say any two values, it just say x and y (two specific values)
Please explain?

As I said the wording is quite strange, GMAT won't use such language. But as OA given as D, then the stem is meant to be understood as I did in my solution. One note though: x and y are variables not exact values.

Thanks for your explanation
It was helpful as always

Technically in a set you can't have repeated values, which is why GMAT stats questions which permit repeated values always talk about "lists" of numbers, or "data sets" (which can have repeated values). So here, when you use Statement 2, you don't need to use the property that "If x is in S, then 1/x is in S" to prove that you have another '1' in the set -- you already know '1' is in the set, and there can only be one '1' in a set. The only question is, reading this, "If both x and y are in S, then so is x + y", whether x and y can represent the exact same value from the set. If so, then when 1 is in the set, so is 1+1 and so is thus 2+1, but if not, the set could just be {1}. Because of the word "both", I'd be inclined to think that x and y need to be different values, but there's no unambiguous answer to that question.

So really we're just left to guess what the question writer meant. Bunuel has certainly correctly interpreted the intentions of the question writer, but the wording of the question doesn't convey those intentions properly. There are official questions (rare ones) that test a similar concept that have none of the issues that this question has, and those might be worth looking at, but this question is not.

Hi Bunuel,

If the answer is D then both the condition A & B should answer the question independently but you have use condition A & B together to answer the question.

Is it right ?



"(1) 1 is in S --> according to (i) \(\frac{1}{1}=1\) (another 1) must also be in S, then according to (ii) \(1+1=2\) must also be in S --> \(1+2=3\) must also be in S. Sufficient.
"
as per the condition B only one value is given So we can consider it either as X or as Y.

Highlighted text above is a part of the stem, NOT the statements. The statements are below, (1) and (2).

This helped I had a similar doubt, thanks

Posted from my mobile device

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.