Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.
Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?
(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.
Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Let's go through the sentences first to identify what the passage is saying.
Sentence 1: Mammals used to live in low light levels.
Sentence 2: Extends sentence 1 to: mammals are adapted to low lighting.
Sentence 3: Conclusion - bright artificial light interferes with proper sleep cycles for mammals.
We're looking for the assumption here - what of the option choices states an assumption that, without it, the argument falls apart?
Option A: This closes a logic leap that the passage has. The passage immediately jumps from "mammals adapted to low light" to "bright light messes up sleep". The passage heavily relies on this. Let's hold onto this for now.
Option B: Type of light doesn't matter to the passage, which is discussing the effect of light in general. Eliminate.
Option C: This one also follows the logic of Option A, we will need to dig into these two options later and see which one can stand the stress test. Let's hold onto this for now.
Option D: Tempting, but we're not comparing past mammals to current mammals. We're trying to prove that light affects current mammals. Eliminate.
Option E: Like option B, intensity of light doesn't matter here. Eliminate.
Now let's take Option A and C and see which one can stand up to being challenged better. Both are very close in their logic but with small nuances.
Option A is making a sweeping statement that animals who live in brightly lit environments sleep worse than those who live in dark environments. Option C says that the environmental conditions that mammals evolved in have an affect on modern day sleep cycles. When rephrased, we can see that Option C is a much better explanation for the logical jump that the passage makes. If you added Option C at the end of the passage, it would greatly strengthen it, while Option A would still raise some doubt about whether the passage logic is solid.
Thus, we go with Option C.