Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:14 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,342
 [6]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,342
 [6]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,342
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
JiriNovacek
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 07 Feb 2026
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Posts: 17
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,625
Own Kudos:
5,190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,625
Kudos: 5,190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

conclusion is regular exposure to bright artificial light interfere maintaining proper sleep cycles...

use negation technique and weaken the conclusion

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments do not have more irregular sleep cycles. does not weaken conclusion as its about exposure to artificial light
(B) Exposure to artificial light does not affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light. not relevant to argument
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles does not depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted. weakens the conclusion
(D) Early mammals do not have healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today. does not weaken conclusion
(E) Bright artificial light typically does not exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments. irrelevant to argument

OPTION C is correct
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 16 Apr 2026
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
193
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 189
Kudos: 193
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is C
Let's negate C
If sleep cycle did not depend on those environmental conditions, then adaptation to dim light would not give any reason to think bright Artificial light would disrupt sleep and conclusion would not follow.
Hence C
User avatar
Saks116
Joined: 05 Apr 2022
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 41
Kudos: 22
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option C
If we negate the answer choice ------------->
Which says that mammals sleep cycle doesn't depend on the environmental factors which they have naturally adapted, than in that case having an exposure of bright artificial light will not alter the alter the sleep cycle.
which makes the argument falls apart.
User avatar
luisdicampo
Joined: 10 Feb 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 328
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Deconstructing the Argument
Premise: Modern mammals are naturally adapted to dim lighting (inherited from early mammals).
Conclusion: Therefore, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Identify the Assumption
The argument leaps from "adaptation to dim light" to "sleep disruption by bright light."
This implies a connection: biological functions (like sleep cycles) function best under the conditions the organism is adapted to, and suffer when those conditions are violated.

Check Option (C): "Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted."

Negation Test: If sleep cycles did NOT depend on the conditions to which mammals are adapted, then the fact that mammals are adapted to dim light would be irrelevant to their sleep.

Exposure to bright light wouldn't necessarily be disruptive just because it's not the adaptation. The argument would collapse.
Thus, this assumption is necessary.

Answer: C
User avatar
Thanuja12
Joined: 30 Jul 2025
Last visit: 17 Feb 2026
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
4
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 395 Q71 V72 DI67
GPA: 7.33
GMAT Focus 1: 395 Q71 V72 DI67
Posts: 16
Kudos: 4
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
#Early mammals =low light environments
#Modern mammals =adapted to dim lighting
Con: BL≠Sleep Cycles
If c is not true conclusion breaks
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer C
The biologist doesn't mention the link between dim lights and sleep cycles, but it must be assumed for the argument to make sense.

A. is a claim that would support the conclusion but it's not needed for the argument to be true
B. E. difference between artificial and natural light is not mentioned or relevant
D. the difference between early mammals and mammals today is irrelevant
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
897
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Prethinking
1. Argument talks about lighting and concludes about sleep. So the author assumes lighting has something to do with sleep.
2. Also, author assumes, mammals cannot adapt to the bright artificial light like mammals did in the past

A - Regular exposure is not equal to spending most of the time. This is irrelevant
B - Argument is not about different reaction to natural and artificial light affects on brain
C - Yes, aligned with prethinking 1 above
D - Out of scope, nothing to support this
E - This might be true but this does not necessarily has to be true for the argument to hold
Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
flippedeclipse
Joined: 26 Apr 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more

Let's go through the sentences first to identify what the passage is saying.

Sentence 1: Mammals used to live in low light levels.
Sentence 2: Extends sentence 1 to: mammals are adapted to low lighting.
Sentence 3: Conclusion - bright artificial light interferes with proper sleep cycles for mammals.

We're looking for the assumption here - what of the option choices states an assumption that, without it, the argument falls apart?

Option A: This closes a logic leap that the passage has. The passage immediately jumps from "mammals adapted to low light" to "bright light messes up sleep". The passage heavily relies on this. Let's hold onto this for now.
Option B: Type of light doesn't matter to the passage, which is discussing the effect of light in general. Eliminate.
Option C: This one also follows the logic of Option A, we will need to dig into these two options later and see which one can stand the stress test. Let's hold onto this for now.
Option D: Tempting, but we're not comparing past mammals to current mammals. We're trying to prove that light affects current mammals. Eliminate.
Option E: Like option B, intensity of light doesn't matter here. Eliminate.

Now let's take Option A and C and see which one can stand up to being challenged better. Both are very close in their logic but with small nuances.

Option A is making a sweeping statement that animals who live in brightly lit environments sleep worse than those who live in dark environments. Option C says that the environmental conditions that mammals evolved in have an affect on modern day sleep cycles. When rephrased, we can see that Option C is a much better explanation for the logical jump that the passage makes. If you added Option C at the end of the passage, it would greatly strengthen it, while Option A would still raise some doubt about whether the passage logic is solid.

Thus, we go with Option C.
User avatar
obedear
Joined: 05 Sep 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I selected choice A.

For assumption questions, I negate the answer choice and see which negation would disrupt the argument.

A - If mammals that spend most of their time in bright environments tend to have less irregular sleep cycles, i.e., more regular sleep cycles, then the argument that exposure to bright environments (either natural or artificial) causes interference with sleep is directly contradicted.
B - If exposure to artificial light affects the brain the same as exposure to natural light, this supports the argument which drew a parallel between the two types of light.
C - If modern mammals' sleep cycles depend entirely on the environmental conditions, this also supports the argument.
D - If early mammals had less healthy sleep cycles than mammals of today, that does not affect the argument.
E - If bright artificial lights are typically of a lower intensity compared to daylight, that would imply they are more dim, which the argument suggests mammals are more naturally adapted to. However, there is no reason to think that because the mammals are more naturally adapted to the light that it would hinder their ability to maintain proper sleep cycles.
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Only talks about mammals that currently live in bright environments.....Irrelevant
B. Only talks about bright light and natural light affects to the brain ......not needed to be assumed.
C. Modern mammals sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.....This option states that modern mammals sleep cycles are still influenced by environmental conditions they adapted to. Negation of this option also weakens the conclusion.........Yes
D. Comparison is made between earlier and current mammals sleep cycles......Not required
E. Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments......Not required

C
User avatar
gchandana
Joined: 16 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 170
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 191
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We have to observe how the author moves from being adapted to dim lighting and concludes that the lighting affects the sleep cycle. Option C bridges this gap.

A. We don't have to assume this at all. We want to connect lighting with sleep cycles.
B. Sure, but does it interfere with sleep? Also, we are talking about dim and bright lights.
D. This comparison is not relevant.
E. This is talking about the intensity of the light, which again is not relevant to our argument.

Option C.
Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
haianh
Joined: 29 Oct 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 45
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.
Premise:
- Early mammals spent most of their time in dim lightning.
- Today mammals are naturally adapted to dim lightning.
Reasoning: mammals today needs dim lightning to sleep properly.

C says: today mammals' sleep cycles depend partially on natural adaptations - dim lightning. If not, bright artificial light would not affect sleep cycle and the conclusion would fail.

Answer: C.
User avatar
LunaticMaestro
Joined: 02 Jul 2023
Last visit: 17 Feb 2026
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106
Posts: 44
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
negating the assumption breaks it apart; what if the regular exposure to artificial bright light is same as the natural light ?
User avatar
harishg
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
174
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Posts: 176
Kudos: 174
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As we can understand from the argument, the premises talks about the adaptation of mammals to dim lighting but the conclusion jumps to saying that bright artificial light interferes with the sleep cycle of modern day mammals.

The assumption being made here is that the process of natural adaptation is atleast somewhat relevant or important to maintaining proper sleep cycles. This is being conveyed in Option C

Therefore, Option C
User avatar
aka007
Joined: 15 Nov 2019
Last visit: 19 Mar 2026
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 42
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise 1: Early Mammal spent more time in low light.
Premise 2: Mammals today are adapted to low light (evolution)
Conclusion: Bright light interferes with sleep cycle.

P1 and P2 are connected however doesn't have a direct connection with the conclusion as it appears to have a missing link. Find the missing link.

A. Incorrect. It talks about a consequence of bright light but does not deal with the assumption that the biologist has made.
B. Incorrect. Not relevant to topic as it deals it how natural and artificial light affect the brain which is not the matter of concern here.
C. Correct. It connects the premise to the conclusion by stating that sleep is dependent on the naturally adapted environmental conditions.
D. Incorrect. Not relevant as there is no comparison between sleep cycles of earlier and current mammals.
E. Incorrect. Not relevant.

Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 266
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion - Regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles

Option A - this would be more of evidence rather than an assumption - eliminate
Option B - how brain reacts to light is not our concern or our assumption - eliminate
Option C - now this is an assumption that is required - negation of this would make the conclusion to collapse - Hold on
Option D - Comparison of sleep quality of the early mammals to modern mammals? out of scope - eliminate
Option E - Bright artificial light exceeds the daylight of nature? out of scope - eliminate

Correct answer - Option C
Bunuel
Biologist: Early mammals spent most of their time in environments with low light levels, such as forests and burrows. As a result, mammals today are naturally adapted to dim lighting. Hence, regular exposure to bright artificial light is likely to interfere with maintaining proper sleep cycles.

Which of the following is an assumption the biologist’s argument requires?

(A) Mammals that spend most of their time in brightly lit environments tend to have more irregular sleep cycles.
(B) Exposure to artificial light affects the brain differently than exposure to natural light.
(C) Modern mammals’ sleep cycles depend at least in part on environmental conditions to which mammals are naturally adapted.
(D) Early mammals had healthier sleep cycles than most mammals have today.
(E) Bright artificial light typically exceeds the intensity of daylight in natural environments.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
linnet
Joined: 11 Dec 2025
Last visit: 22 Jan 2026
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 81
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The last statement is our conclusion hence the correct answer is A
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts