GMATillIdie
Hi all,
I recently took the GMAT (online version) for the first time and scored a 750 (49Q, 44V), 8IR. Although I am fairly pleased with the score, it is a touch below what I’d been scoring on practice tests:
1. GMAT official practice 1 - 740 (this was with zero prep)
2. GMAT official practice 2 - 770
3. GMAT official practice 3 - 780
4. GMAT official practice 4 - 790
5. GMAT official practice 5 - 790
6. GMAT official practice 6 - 780
I’ve seen a fair number of people say they scored lower on the real thing than the practice test. Equally, I’ve seen plenty people saying they scored nearly the exact same on the official practice tests as on the real thing. I personally did find the real exam to be a step up from the practice exams, particularly on quant. I would not attribute this to test day nerves and such - I’m a confident test taker; questions were genuinely just more difficult.
My questions for the group:
1. I know it’s been asked a million times, but do you think the real GMAT is tougher than the practice exams? Or might I, unluckily, just have gotten a set of questions testing concepts I’m not so strong on?
2. Do you think I’d do well to take the exam again in the hope that I might score closer to what I was getting on practice tests 2-6?
Thanks for your help!
Hello,
GMATillIdie. I have to say that a 740 raw is phenomenal, one of the best scores I have seen if I am to take
zero prep at face value. As others have written above, I would not recommend taking the exam again if I intended to apply to business school. I would go with the 750. (You will be ahead of the class average anywhere.) If you have caught the bug, as it were, and feel this burning desire to prove yourself after resuming your training, hitting those concepts that might have caught you off guard this last time, then that is a different proposition, one that just about any perfectionist will understand. (It could also come in handy if you wish to become a tutor. The 99th percentile is a highly competitive threshold.)
Do I think the actual GMAT™ is tougher than the practice exams? I suspect that Quant in particular at the highest level, by which I mean 50-51, is, in fact, slightly more difficult. The official practice exams were written several years ago, and since the April 2018 revision to the real exam that saw the number of questions reduced in both the Quant and Verbal sections, I have seen a single perfect score and seemingly fewer 51s in Quant. I doubt people are getting smarter, but they are preparing for the exam much better than did their predecessors from, say, even 10 years ago. I
commented on a strange-looking ESR that showed that a student who had missed just 5 questions across the Quant section earned a 47. Yes, a lot depends on the types of questions missed (i.e. difficulty), but that still seems a bit harsh. Luck plays its part as well. Some 50-51 scorers say that they have seen no permutation/combinatorics questions (after much study to master the material), while others say they have. Your best bet, should you decide to give the test another go, is to shore up any weak spots and not simply hope for the right types of questions.
Whatever you decide to do, good luck.
- Andrew