Last visit was: 27 Sep 2026, 12:16 It is currently 27 Sep 2026, 12:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,953
Own Kudos:
844,013
 [2]
Given Kudos: 111,851
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,953
Kudos: 844,013
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 27 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,953
Own Kudos:
844,013
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111,851
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,953
Kudos: 844,013
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
officiisnobis
Joined: 24 Feb 2026
Last visit: 27 Sep 2026
Posts: 142
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 176
GMAT Focus 1: 535 Q80 V78 DI72
GMAT Focus 1: 535 Q80 V78 DI72
Posts: 142
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
LongZero
Joined: 26 Aug 2026
Last visit: 24 Sep 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could you explain why plz?
how is the correlation between two proportions positive, if V increases then P decreases? They cant both go the same way?
officiisnobis
1. Vertical Position and sizes
2. A positive relationship
User avatar
LogicDriven
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Last visit: 27 Sep 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Posts: 27
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dropdown 1: only the vertical positions and sizes of the bubbles

Dropdown 2: a negative
User avatar
shreyans0311
Joined: 31 Aug 2024
Last visit: 27 Sep 2026
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 144
Products:
Posts: 11
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel for Drop down 1
why does horizontal positions of the bubble is wrong? Right now the graph shows bubbles at (100-virgin%). there would be no need to change the size of bubbles if we move them horizontally. Is this approach flawed?
User avatar
zaturn
Joined: 06 Aug 2025
Last visit: 25 Sep 2026
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Products:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. We know from the question that 'The cathode material.... consisted entirely of recycled material and virgin material'
so from 100% if recycle is 20% -> virgin is 80%, and vice versa.

Therefore, changing the horizontal axis from R (recycle) -> V (virgin) will make the bubbles reverse their orders without changing any other thing, including the performance standard (vertical axis) and avg. energy capacity (size)

Answer: vertical axis and size would remain unchanged

2. The question asks for the relationship between V (virgin) and P (performance).
We already know the relationship between R and V (R + V = 100%)
The graph shows that:
low R -> high P

This is equal to:
high V -> high P

Answer: positive relationship
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 26 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,369
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 716
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,369
Kudos: 33,967
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi shreyans0311,

I see exactly where this is coming from. You're picturing each bubble as a fixed prototype, so it feels like the bubble should just "stay put" horizontally. But a bubble's horizontal position is set by whatever value the x-axis is measuring, and that value changes when you switch the axis.

Right now the x-axis measures R. Look at the leftmost bubble: it sits at R = 15, near the left edge. If you redraw the chart so the x-axis measures V instead, that same prototype's x-value becomes V = 100 - 15 = 85 - so the bubble jumps to the far right side of the chart. It's the same prototype, but its horizontal position has moved all the way across.

Run it across all five and you'll see them flip:

- R = 15 - V = 85
- R = 30 - V = 70
- R = 50 - V = 50 (the only one that stays put)
- R = 65 - V = 35
- R = 85 - V = 15

So the horizontal positions do change (four of the five move). That's why "only the horizontal positions" and "horizontal and vertical positions" are both wrong.

What actually stays unchanged:

Vertical position (P): how many cells met the standard doesn't depend on whether you label the composition as R or V. Same number, same height.

Bubble size (E): average energy capacity is its own measurement - switching the x-axis label doesn't touch it.

You're right that there's no reason to resize the bubbles - and that instinct is correct! The size stays. The piece to fix is that relabeling the x-axis from R to V forces each bubble to a new horizontal spot (except the R = 50 one). That's why the answer is the vertical positions and sizes remain unchanged.

Answer: the vertical positions and sizes of the bubbles

shreyans0311
Bunuel for Drop down 1
why does horizontal positions of the bubble is wrong? Right now the graph shows bubbles at (100-virgin%). there would be no need to change the size of bubbles if we move them horizontally. Is this approach flawed?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 26 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,369
Own Kudos:
33,967
 [1]
Given Kudos: 716
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,369
Kudos: 33,967
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi LongZero,

You're right to be careful here, and your instinct about the graph is correct: on the chart, as R goes up, P goes down. The trap is that the question asks about V, not R - and V moves in the opposite direction from R.

Where the reasoning slips

Your statement "if V increases then P decreases" is actually describing R, not V. Remember V = 100 - R, so V and R are mirror images: when one is high, the other is low.

Let me rewrite the five points using V. Reading off the bubbles (R, then P), and converting each with V = 100 - R:

- R = 15, P = 82 - V = 85
- R = 30, P = 70 - V = 70
- R = 50, P = 64 - V = 50
- R = 65, P = 46 - V = 35
- R = 85, P = 40 - V = 15

Now line them up from low V to high V:

- V = 15 - P = 40
- V = 35 - P = 46
- V = 50 - P = 64
- V = 70 - P = 70
- V = 85 - P = 82

As V climbs, P climbs right along with it. They do go the same way - that's a positive correlation.

Why it flips

High V means low R. Low R is where P is highest (the top-left bubble). So more virgin material lines up with better performance. The negative trend you saw belongs to R and P; flipping to V flips the sign.

Quick rehearsal: if A goes up while B goes down (negative), and V = 100 - A, then C goes up when B goes up - so C and B are positive. Swapping to the "complement" variable always flips the direction of the correlation.

Answer: the vertical positions and sizes of the bubbles

LongZero
could you explain why plz?
how is the correlation between two proportions positive, if V increases then P decreases? They cant both go the same way?

Moderators:
Math Expert
113953 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts