Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 27 May 2017, 15:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 04:31
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (02:10) wrong based on 5 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden plants, though only if it is diluted at least to ten parts water to one part fungicide. Moreover, this fungicide is known to be so effective against powdery mildew that it has the capacity to eliminate it completely from rose plants. Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 104
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 05:19
Is it D?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1561
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 10:05
i think its E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 11:29
Yes pmenon, OA is E. But can you explain why B is incorrect ?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 278
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 2

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2009, 11:59
rahuljones1 wrote:
A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden plants, though only if it is diluted at least to ten parts water to one part fungicide. Moreover, this fungicide is known to be so effective against powdery mildew that it has the capacity to eliminate it completely from rose plants. Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water.


Conclusion of the argument:
Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants

B - Harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects has nothing to do with the conclusion. If you tried to link beneficial insects to harming planits you were thinking to hard and made an unjustified assumption.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1409
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 388 [0], given: 1

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2009, 14:22
rahuljones1 wrote:
A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden plants, though only if it is diluted at least to ten parts water to one part fungicide. Moreover, this fungicide is known to be so effective against powdery mildew that it has the capacity to eliminate it completely from rose plants. Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water.


I arrived at E by POE.

Negate E

The effectiveness of the fungicide depends on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water

Conc is

Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants

So Negated E is saying effectiveness depends on more concentration of the F. if it is correct as long as sufficiently diluted does not hold good and the F might not provide the means. So Conc falls apart.

Hence E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 430
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 4

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2009, 20:48
E for me by POE

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 489
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 13

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2009, 13:22
Hi mates,

icandy, To be honest I don't see why E is correct :oops: I mean, if this fungicide is diluted in a wrong proportion, it can damage the plant (first part of the question)

E says that the effectiveness of that fungicide does not depend on the proportion water VS fungicide, but in fact, as the question says, it does...

For me, it would be D

what do you think guys?

BTW, what's the source?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1265
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 447 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2009, 04:57
it shld be E
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1553
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2009, 10:09
What is the source? I ended up selecting C.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 738
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 695 [0], given: 99

Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2009, 13:19
I too choose C.
Re: CR   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2009, 13:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The fact that tobacco smoke inhaled by smokers harms the boros2203 3 08 Feb 2010, 06:35
An experimental microwave clothes dryer heats neither air Jivana 8 13 Aug 2009, 03:08
1 Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not prasun84 6 20 Dec 2009, 19:01
The fact that tobacco smoke inhaled by smokers harms the eyunni 10 26 Oct 2007, 14:34
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not sidbidus 4 19 Jun 2007, 03:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.