anshgupta_2It might help to let us know why you
do think E strengthens, especially since it has been discussed a fair amount in the thread. But E seems to be trying to get at the idea of repurposing workers, and we don't know enough to make use of that information. The conclusion is simply that by automating one process, those who grow crops can save on labor costs. E tells us that labor can be used for other purposes--sure, why not?--but it doesn't let us know anything about the number of workers required, duration of employment, etc. Certainly, farms can still employ laborers for other purposes, and this might involve spending the same amount on labor as before or a different amount. But either way, that doesn't tell us whether this machine REDUCED labor costs. That is simply about whether someone can use the machine to weed and avoid paying workers to do that specific job.