GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 14:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1161
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2019, 08:37
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:50) correct 44% (02:05) wrong based on 214 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices. The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior. Still, the trial was worthwhile, since it provided useful information about the company’s practices. After all, this information has emboldened the company’s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument?


(A) Even if the company had not been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices, the trial probably would have had some effect on the company’s behavior.

(B) The light shed on the company’s practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior.

(C) The penalty imposed on the company will likely have little or no effect on its behavior.

(D) The company’s trial on charges of engaging in monopolistic practices was worthwhile.

(E) The penalty imposed on the company in the trial should have been larger.

_________________
Non progredi est regredi
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 994
Location: India
Re: A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2019, 22:02
Akela wrote:
A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices. The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior. Still, the trial was worthwhile, since it provided useful information about the company’s practices. After all, this information has emboldened the company’s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument?


(A) Even if the company had not been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices, the trial probably would have had some effect on the company’s behavior.

(B) The light shed on the company’s practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior.

(C) The penalty imposed on the company will likely have little or no effect on its behavior.

(D) The company’s trial on charges of engaging in monopolistic practices was worthwhile.

(E) The penalty imposed on the company in the trial should have been larger.


So if we break the above argument in pieces, we realize the inline
1) Large company is convicted of ill practices.
2) They will still continue with those practices.
3) Conviction was worthwhile, as it provided people with valuable insights.

(A) Even if the company had not been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices, the trial probably would have had some effect on the company’s behavior.
This doesn't sum up the intent of the argument.

(B) The light shed on the company’s practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior.
Lets keep this one on hold for now(Since we had read the same lines in the argument)

(C) The penalty imposed on the company will likely have little or no effect on its behavior.
This is not the main idea.(just part of the argument)

(D) The company’s trial on charges of engaging in monopolistic practices was worthwhile.
This one does sum up the whole argument .

(E) The penalty imposed on the company in the trial should have been larger.
Irrelevant

Lets go back to B
The light shed on the company’s practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior.
Isnt this part too extreme, that is contradicting one of the premises.

Answer D
_________________
If you notice any discrepancy in my reasoning, please let me know. Lets improve together.

Quote which i can relate to.
Many of life's failures happen with people who do not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2401
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2019, 22:49
1
A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices. The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior. Still, the trial was worthwhile, since it provided useful information about the company’s practices. After all, this information has emboldened the company’s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors.

Boil it down-
A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices-> Background information. There has been a conviction.
The penalty imposed on the company will probably have little if any effect on its behavior-> Opposing point. Do not expect the conviction to change behavior.
Still, the trial was worthwhile, since it provided useful information about the company’s practices. ->Turnaround word "still" which, when following an opposing point, almost always introduces evidence or the conclusion. We get another indicator word, "since," which tells us that what follows it is offered in support of what came before it. That makes the first part of this line a conclusion and the second part evidence.
After all, this information has emboldened the company’s direct competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior toward customers and competitors.-> "After all" indicates a continuation, and since what came before it is a premise, we know this line to be a premise as well, making the first part of line 3 the main conclusion.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the argument?


(A) Even if the company had not been convicted of engaging in monopolistic practices, the trial probably would have had some effect on the company’s behavior. - Incorrect

(B) The light shed on the company’s practices by the trial has emboldened its competitors, alerted potential rivals, and forced the company to restrain its unfair behavior. -incorrect; supports the main conclusion

(C) The penalty imposed on the company will likely have little or no effect on its behavior. - Incorrect

(D) The company’s trial on charges of engaging in monopolistic practices was worthwhile. - Correct

(E) The penalty imposed on the company in the trial should have been larger. - Out of scope

Answer D
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2019
Posts: 2
Re: A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2019, 06:02
Answer: D

As it clearly captures the idea the passage is trying to convey.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 42
Reviews Badge
Re: A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2019, 20:56
Why A is wrong?

Conclusion: if compny's practicess are exposed to competitors, this forces cmpny to restrain unfair behavior towards competition and customer
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic   [#permalink] 28 Jan 2019, 20:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A large company has been convicted of engaging in monopolistic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne