Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 22:52 It is currently 17 May 2026, 22:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
usre123
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Posts: 73
Kudos: 237
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
regan1sp
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 21 Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
MAH
Joined: 30 Oct 2013
Last visit: 31 Mar 2020
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 55
Posts: 36
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WilDThiNg
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 996
Posts: 50
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
metallicafan
Are you sure?
My answer is 1/20.

I tell you why:
First, we have to identify the total number of combinations of seats in which the three girls can occupy.
So, 10C3 = 120 possible combinations.

Now, we have to identify the combinations in which there are not two girls together.

Only to offer a better explanation, I will write the combinations:

Seat N°: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
G B G B G B B B B B
B G B G B G B B B B
B B G B G B G B B B
B B B G B G B G B B
B B B B G B G B G B
B B B B B G B G B G

Based on this, there are only 6 scenarios in which there are not two girls together.
Obviously, it is not necessary to write this combinations, you only have to see that when the third girl is in the 10th position, the first girl is in the 6th. But the first girl cannot be in the 7th, because there is not the 11th position for the third girl.
(I think that there is a way to solve this part with combinatronics, but I didn't find it)

So, we have this 6 scenarios and the total number of events (120).
We divide: 6 / 120 = 1/20

What do you think?

I think I deserve kudos 8-)

This approach is not correct. There are more cases possible, for no girls to sit together, for example:

G B B G B G B B B B
Or:
G B G B B B B B B G
...

Answer given by 4gmatmumbai is correct.

A row of seats in a movie hall contains 10 seats. 3 Girls & 7 boys need to occupy those seats. What is the probability that no two girls will sit together?

Consider the following:
*B*B*B*B*B*B*B*

Now, if girls will occupy the places of 8 stars no girl will sit together.

# of ways 3 girls can occupy the places of these 8 stars is \(C^3_8\);
# of ways 3 girls can be arranged on these places is \(3!\);
# of ways 7 boys can be arranged is \(7!\).

So total # of ways to arrange 3 Girls and 7 boys so that no girls are together is \(C^3_8*3!*7!\);
Total # of ways to arrange 10 children is \(10!\).

So \(P=\frac{C^3_8*3!*7!}{10!}=\frac{7}{15}\).

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,

Just one thing i am getting confused about: the stem says that the row contains 10 seats. So, when we are saying that girls can occupy * number of seats i.e. 8 in number - are we not going beyond the confines of the question, since if that was correct the row should have at least 8+7 i.e. 15 seats.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,903
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WilDThiNg
Bunuel
metallicafan
Are you sure?
My answer is 1/20.

I tell you why:
First, we have to identify the total number of combinations of seats in which the three girls can occupy.
So, 10C3 = 120 possible combinations.

Now, we have to identify the combinations in which there are not two girls together.

Only to offer a better explanation, I will write the combinations:

Seat N°: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
G B G B G B B B B B
B G B G B G B B B B
B B G B G B G B B B
B B B G B G B G B B
B B B B G B G B G B
B B B B B G B G B G

Based on this, there are only 6 scenarios in which there are not two girls together.
Obviously, it is not necessary to write this combinations, you only have to see that when the third girl is in the 10th position, the first girl is in the 6th. But the first girl cannot be in the 7th, because there is not the 11th position for the third girl.
(I think that there is a way to solve this part with combinatronics, but I didn't find it)

So, we have this 6 scenarios and the total number of events (120).
We divide: 6 / 120 = 1/20

What do you think?

I think I deserve kudos 8-)

This approach is not correct. There are more cases possible, for no girls to sit together, for example:

G B B G B G B B B B
Or:
G B G B B B B B B G
...

Answer given by 4gmatmumbai is correct.

A row of seats in a movie hall contains 10 seats. 3 Girls & 7 boys need to occupy those seats. What is the probability that no two girls will sit together?

Consider the following:
*B*B*B*B*B*B*B*

Now, if girls will occupy the places of 8 stars no girl will sit together.

# of ways 3 girls can occupy the places of these 8 stars is \(C^3_8\);
# of ways 3 girls can be arranged on these places is \(3!\);
# of ways 7 boys can be arranged is \(7!\).

So total # of ways to arrange 3 Girls and 7 boys so that no girls are together is \(C^3_8*3!*7!\);
Total # of ways to arrange 10 children is \(10!\).

So \(P=\frac{C^3_8*3!*7!}{10!}=\frac{7}{15}\).

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,

Just one thing i am getting confused about: the stem says that the row contains 10 seats. So, when we are saying that girls can occupy * number of seats i.e. 8 in number - are we not going beyond the confines of the question, since if that was correct the row should have at least 8+7 i.e. 15 seats.

No. You are assuming that all the spots will be occupied at the same time.

If you are given, *B*B*B*B*B*B*B*

My arrangement can be *B*BGB*BGB*B*BG or GBGB*B*B*BGB*B*, so technically you only have 10 occupied seats and hence within the confines of the question.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
WilDThiNg
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 996
Posts: 50
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[No. You are assuming that all the spots will be occupied at the same time.

If you are given, *B*B*B*B*B*B*B*

My arrangement can be *B*BGB*BGB*B*BG or GBGB*B*B*BGB*B*, so technically you only have 10 occupied seats and hence within the confines of the question.

Hope this helps.[/quote]

Thank you for such a prompt response. Agree that the number of seats occupied eventually would only be 10, however, when we are selecting 3 seats for Gs out of 8 remaining options - those 8 options need to exist, to begin with. Now, when Bs have already occupied 7 seats out of 10 (the number of seats that exist), are there not only 3 seats left to choose from.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,903
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
WilDThiNg


Thank you for such a prompt response. Agree that the number of seats occupied eventually would only be 10, however, when we are selecting 3 seats for Gs out of 8 remaining options - those 8 options need to exist, to begin with. Now, when Bs have already occupied 7 seats out of 10 (the number of seats that exist), are there not only 3 seats left to choose from.

You are correct with your last statement that there are only 3 actual spots to work with. Not all '*' are available at the same time.
avatar
zet
Joined: 08 Aug 2016
Last visit: 23 Sep 2017
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 31
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EvaJager
shahideh
Could you plz help me why my approach is wrong?

P(not 2 girls sit together)=1-P(2 girls sit together or 3 girls sit together)
If we name girls as X, Y, and Z then the above equation:

p(not 2 girls sit together)=1-p(XY or XZ or ZY or XYZ)

\(P(xy)=P(xz)=P(zy)= \frac{9!*2}{10!}\)

\(P(xyz)=\frac{8!*3!}{10!}\)

So, P(not 2 girls sit together)=\(1-\frac{9!*2+9!*2+9!*2+8!*3!}{10!}=1-\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{3}\)

What's wrong???

You didn't distinguish between the cases of exactly two girls sitting together and one sitting alone and the case when all three girls sit together.
\(P(xy)=P(xz)=P(zy)= \frac{9!*2}{10!}\) each of these also includes some cases when all three girls sit together.
Now, it gets even more complicated. When considering xy sitting together, it might happen that z joined them, so you also had the arrangement xyz or zxy, but since you took only 2! (just switching between x and y only), you subtracted only 4 out of the full 3!=6 possibilities. Which means that you subtracted \(3\cdot\frac{4}{6}=2\) or twice more the probability P(xyz).

To your result, you should add back twice P(xyz). You will get \(\frac{1}{3}+2\cdot\frac{2\cdot3}{9\cdot10}=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2}{15}=\frac{7}{15}.\)

Hi Evajager,

I used the same approach and ended with 1/3.

I understand your point, however my logic was:

G1G2..(boys)...G3 (let's take first GG as 1 person, we have 9 people now)

= 9! * 3! (Gs can be arranged inside the girls group) ---->> this also includes the cases when 3 girls are together, as you mentioned. Among the arrangements, there are the ones which G3 is next to G1 or G2. Thus, isn't total # of no 2 girls sitting together:

= 10! - 9! * 3!
avatar
D8
Joined: 15 May 2017
Last visit: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zet
EvaJager
shahideh
Could you plz help me why my approach is wrong?

P(not 2 girls sit together)=1-P(2 girls sit together or 3 girls sit together)
If we name girls as X, Y, and Z then the above equation:

p(not 2 girls sit together)=1-p(XY or XZ or ZY or XYZ)

\(P(xy)=P(xz)=P(zy)= \frac{9!*2}{10!}\)

\(P(xyz)=\frac{8!*3!}{10!}\)

So, P(not 2 girls sit together)=\(1-\frac{9!*2+9!*2+9!*2+8!*3!}{10!}=1-\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{3}\)

What's wrong???

You didn't distinguish between the cases of exactly two girls sitting together and one sitting alone and the case when all three girls sit together.
\(P(xy)=P(xz)=P(zy)= \frac{9!*2}{10!}\) each of these also includes some cases when all three girls sit together.
Now, it gets even more complicated. When considering xy sitting together, it might happen that z joined them, so you also had the arrangement xyz or zxy, but since you took only 2! (just switching between x and y only), you subtracted only 4 out of the full 3!=6 possibilities. Which means that you subtracted \(3\cdot\frac{4}{6}=2\) or twice more the probability P(xyz).

To your result, you should add back twice P(xyz). You will get \(\frac{1}{3}+2\cdot\frac{2\cdot3}{9\cdot10}=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2}{15}=\frac{7}{15}.\)

Hi Evajager,

I used the same approach and ended with 1/3.

I understand your point, however my logic was:

G1G2..(boys)...G3 (let's take first GG as 1 person, we have 9 people now)

= 9! * 3! (Gs can be arranged inside the girls group) ---->> this also includes the cases when 3 girls are together, as you mentioned. Among the arrangements, there are the ones which G3 is next to G1 or G2. Thus, isn't total # of no 2 girls sitting together:

= 10! - 9! * 3!
Hi people Im new here so excuse me if Im doıng something wrong.

What if I just choose 3 spaces from 8 places 8C3 and divide it by 10C3 which is sitting girls in the normal seat number
avatar
AjjayKannan
Joined: 26 Dec 2018
Last visit: 23 Nov 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Posts: 18
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why do we consider the Boys' seating position when probability concerns only about the girls' position?
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 39,089
Own Kudos:
Posts: 39,089
Kudos: 1,125
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
110560 posts
Tuck School Moderator
852 posts