It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 14:29

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A sandhog claims that he has a list of thirty deceased

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

A sandhog claims that he has a list of thirty deceased [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 12:48
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A sandhog claims that he has a list of thirty deceased workers who worked as a group on a tunnel that cut through a radon-intense area. He started his list after an oncologist reported that the incidences of cancer among sandhogs were five times greater than the incidence of cancer among other construction workers. The tunnel contractor states that its records show that no sandhogs working on the tunnel were exposed to more radiation than was safe.

1- If true, which of the following statements most damages the contractor's claim?
A) The medical records of the oncologist were accurate
B) All thirty of the deceased sandhogs died of radiation-related cancer
C) The contractor has denied requests to inspect its radiation records
D) Sandhogs contract illness at higher-than-normal rates
E) The remaining sandhogs that worked on the tunnel show no signs of illness

2- Which of the following conclusions can be drawn most reliably from the passage?
A) Radiation did not cause cancer in the sandhogs
C) The records of the contrator are likely to be inaccurate or incomplete
D) The sandhogs were exposed to radiation elsewhere rather than in the tunnel
E) There is disagreement about the level of radiation that is safe
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: INDIA

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 13:05
my fisrt = B

argument= cancer high among about 30 sandhogs... seems to be caused by the radiiation of the tunnel where thy workd ... contractor says radiation level is safe level...

B says '' all the workers died of radiaton-related cancer... suits well..

A) may be they were but how does that proove to the workers here...
C) denying does not mean lying...
D) actually helps support the contarctor's statement...
E) same ..... as D.

second : my ans wud be D here....

two parts of the one says'' the tunnel work caused the radiation'' and the other( contarctor) says'' the radiation level is safe'' now consdiering both the above to be True we have only D which says like'' the workers did get affected but not in the tunnel we know ...elsewere...

hope that helps! let me know If I m wrong1

Have fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 184

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 13:11
Paul wrote:
A sandhog claims that he has a list of thirty deceased workers who worked as a group on a tunnel that cut through a radon-intense area. He started his list after an oncologist reported that the incidences of cancer among sandhogs were five times greater than the incidence of cancer among other construction workers. The tunnel contractor states that its records show that no sandhogs working on the tunnel were exposed to more radiation than was safe.

1- If true, which of the following statements most damages the contractor's claim?
A) The medical records of the oncologist were accurate
B) All thirty of the deceased sandhogs died of radiation-related cancer
C) The contractor has denied requests to inspect its radiation records
D) Sandhogs contract illness at higher-than-normal rates
E) The remaining sandhogs that worked on the tunnel show no signs of illness

2- Which of the following conclusions can be drawn most reliably from the passage?
A) Radiation did not cause cancer in the sandhogs
C) The records of the contrator are likely to be inaccurate or incomplete
D) The sandhogs were exposed to radiation elsewhere rather than in the tunnel
E) There is disagreement about the level of radiation that is safe

1. C
2. E

I'll explain a bit later.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2004
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angeles

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 13:23
Wow, this one is tricky

There are some very close calls here

1. For the first one I would agree that B should be the correct answer
2. E

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 651

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 13:33
1. C
2. E

if correct exp will follow.

Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Ukraine

Show Tags

25 Jun 2004, 14:17
1. To damage the contractorâ€™s claim most, we need to show that the guyâ€™s lying about the radiation to which the sandhogs were exposed. (C) strongly suggests that.

2. (E). Kind of difficult to explain the obvious.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

25 Jun 2004, 14:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A sandhog claims that he has a list of thirty deceased

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.