rajatyadav1994
I answered E. Trying to understand if that choice is WRONG since:-
CAUSE - Radiation
EFFECT - death
Correct Ans Choice (B) confirms that effect indeed due to cause
Wrong Ans Choice (E) states that people outside scope of cause did not see effect, and hence, we cannot be using this to conclude anything within the context of this question?
Experts kindly help
Hey Rajat!
Okay so E is actually doing the opposite of what is asked in the question. The question wants us to undermine what the contractor claimed...which is that all his workers are working within the acceptable range of radiation and that no one was exposed to more than what was safe (this is just an inference...not the exact stated sentence)
now we have to damage this claim...which means weaken it. In order to weaken it, we somehow have to prove that somehow, majority or the workers do indeed have cancer.
B does this by stating that all the 30 deaths that happened were due to cancer which was related to the radiation they were exposed to.
E on the other hand...infact strengthens the contractors claim by stating that other workers have not shown any signs of illness (it doenst talk about the 30 dead too)...so we dont really get anything form this which will help us weaken the claim made. hence this is rejected.
Additionally, I think if you dont understand this option, looking at B and understanding that option should help you select it.
Hope this helps
PS workers here mean Sandhogs.