A warrant was issued on Sunday by a New York prosecutor for the arrest of Henry Urick, until recently chairman of the mobile telecommunications company Telecom,
including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
The sentence means that warrant was issued by NY prosecutor to arrest Henry Urick and eleven others who were connected to his family’s business empire.
In the non – underlined part of the sentence we can ignore the modifier ‘until .. telecom’ and formulate the sentence. This leaves us with only option A and B since C,D and E are for reasons as follows. A though looks good but ‘verb + ing’ modifier seems to say that Henry Urick includes eleven other people which is illogical.
A. including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire. – WRONG. As described above.
B. along with eleven other people connected with his family's business empire. – CORRECT. Using along with makes Henry Urick and eleven people a single entity aginst whom warrant is issued.
C. and including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire. – WRONG. Using ‘and’ and ‘verb + ing’ modifier together don’t make correct parallelism.
D. for eleven other people connected with his family's business empire. – WRONG. Comma + FANBOYS used for dependent clause which is incorrect.
E. and for including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire – WRONG. Redundancy error for using ‘for’ and ‘including’ together.
Answer (B).